Oh you tested multiple tomes
Ah yes, give me a free DRIVING BUG, so i wont forget about it
Im not that stupid to call it after a one time. 3 full racks 0 explosion
1 Like
The thing with the blowout panel is that the way gajin models it, if it hits ammo and pens the bulkhead between the crew and ammo, you die. From that angle, you should die so im not sure if its a bug or its just unfinished blowout panel
Interesting.
Well, idk
@Gunjob i have heard you like Challenger bug reports, so i came to give you
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yKKAfpg7xgSc
Also can you look at this one?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Ykwh9tLHYjOq
Many thanks
4 Likes
Spooky. I wonder if that happens to other nations, like Russia.
People forget that Gaijin’s rules prevents bias cause they’re too busy letting inaccuracies get to them too much.
@SlowHandClap The roof of T-44 disappeared for a few months a couple years back.
Im hgoing to have to disagree with that. But not in the usual way. Pantsir. Im talking about it possible performance. You have 4 30 guns, 12 missiles that have double the range of other ones and are the fastest in the game, IRST. On paper it is a vechicle that outclasses EVERYTHING. If that is not bias idk what is. And no, saying that Russia needed it is wrong. Tunguska was doing just fine, stats were down due to people playing it as a IFV. And if adding new, why not TOR?
4 Likes
R-27ER as well, that is an insane BVR missile
3 Likes
Ah yes, that thing. Well, i will just say they got it too fast. FIne with it as it is, just too fast
2 Likes
Yep, the last year wouldn’t have been quite so bad if they didn’t hold such an overwhelming advantage in the one area the F3 is designed for
1 Like
Pantsir’s effective missile range is 12km, same as everyone else, and it still can’t hit targets. It’s only 18km against drones & helicopters.
Tunguska was not fine, that’s like saying Roland 1 is fine…
TOR M1 is superior to Pantsir, so you want Soviets to get a more powerful SPAA to replace one you incorrectly think is powerful.
That is why i told this. On paper that thing outpreforms everything. 16 is doable agains planes if they do straght line.
It was fine. I had the pleasure of playing it and i loved it. The thing is was when i played, i saw 90% of them on the cap holding LMB and dying.
I will be honest. I did not played is so i cant say, but on paper it is worse.
1 Like
yes, but still. Adding thing that on paper doubles everyone else is not a thing that should have happend. I think i would be fine if pantsir was added 2 majors later, it would be perfectly fine. But it was in my oppinion, just like 27ER, added too soon. But that is only my point of view.
I just don’t get why gaijjin refuses to fix the mantlet armor on the cr2/3 there is a tonne of info on it. (yes I am writing in anger because this is the 5th time in 4 games I have died to a breach shot.)
@Smin1080p Are the devs looking into fixing the breach/mantlet armour. I just want to know as I don’t know if I should buy the OES. (I will if it gets fixed)
7 Likes
I love how even on the ingame model you can see the gun is literally floating in the air, since the trunnion block is not thick enough to actually reach the trunnion union.
That 200mm thick block should be, at very least, 400mm thick.
I just hope they fix the Challengers’ armor issues (mantlet, missing an internal 50mm thick plate on the sides too, side hull armor being 50mm thick and not 38, etc) once and for all…
These tanks have been Top Tier’s laughingstock for long enough- it is time to make of them the forces to be reckoned with they are in real life.
11 Likes