I think that CFT modification for F-16C block 50 is good idea beacause u will get more fuel and better look of an aircraft.
1 Like
Honestly I get wanting it for upgraded looks but it will make its performance noticeably worse. I think it would be better asking for the two inboard wet pylons to be implemented for drop-tanks given that the inboard pylons can’t take AAM’s and fuel isn’t an issue for ground RB so sacrificing bomb load isn’t a biggie.
Perhaps they will introduce such a variant as a block 60 airframe.
Yeah but my idea on it is that you can remove that modification if you want like masking mesh on the Leopard 2A4 pzbtl. 123. But thank you for your opinion!
1 Like
I mean if it existed IRL i’m all for it being a modification.
1 Like
Bro f16 with cft is ugly. Ruins the slick shape of the f16.
2 Likes
F-16C/D Block 50/52 Plus & F-16I Sufa with conformal fuel tanks (CFT) look bad ass but F-16C/D from USAF never mounted conformal fuel tanks (CFT)
1 Like
so no CFT’s for the USAF F-16’s?