should the centurion action x in game be re-gunned to use the 105 l7a1instead of the 20pdr it currently has as it was fitted with it? I would think the change in gun would make it more effective at 7.7 and above. I know some will say there should be both options or a ability to change guns but I don’t think that would be necessary as the 20pdr is less effective in comparison. what are your thoughts?
it was tested with a L7 105mm as well as 20pdr B gun.
really we should also get a L7 version
but i highly doubt we will so would be better to up gun the one we have and swap it in the tree with the mk5 avre centurion
Just make the L7 version another vehicle. Easy.
105 as an event would be decent. TT would mean nobodys buying the premium and nobody will buy the same prem twice in the same tree
Would be nice from a new Premium at 7.7
The standard 20pdr should be 7.3 because of its weak turret, similar to the Fv4202.
pretty easy one in the files for that
lol no
but but… YES !
the mk3 cent is a beast at 7.7, as good as things like the somua, do you think that ought to move down too?
Seriously though the 20pdr Cent’s are a gem
(Would like to see more 105 Cents though, where’s my Mk.5/2 Gaijin)
Centurion mk 3 and 5/1 are nice at 7.7
I don’t like the turret of the Action X, anytime is weak. Same feeling about absurd weakspot with the 4202. ( Just like Dollar describes the moment :
Volumetric Armor for BOTH would correct the issue and maybe be better in their proper BR.
id prefer a mk6 so that its got the extra armour and the L7 so that its on par with the mk10 at 8.0
cheeks are weak but the roof ia stronger, theres a tradeoff thats fair to keep at the same BR.
4202 is just a far worse vehicle overall from the hull having no armour and not having a reverse gear. I dont think its really worthy of 7.3 due to its transmission alone ngl, however im fairly sure its wrong and ought to be the same as centurions.
as for the clip, theres the main plate of the jumbo pershing and then the crest. of course you non pen that…
