Bruh, why not EVERYONE gets Pansir equivilent instead of not letting a tech tree get one because “WEsTeRn CoUntRY” doesnt have them.
4 Likes
1 is already dumb enough
1 Like
China should have gotten literally anything else besides the Tor.
Not only is it a PoS, but its not even a unique, domestic system and certainly isn’t a good enough SPAA to be a Pantsir equivalent in BR, all the while the actual Pantsir equivalents (FK-1000 and 2000) are nowhere to be seen.
+1
3 Likes
Yes! At MINIMUM they should have gotten the HQ-17A. Sure it is essentially a clone of the Tor, but it is at least domestic and swaps the tracks for wheels. The upgraded FM-2000 and HQ-11/FM-3000 could easily come after.
2 Likes
What’s the difference between FK-1000 and Sky Dragon 12?
1 Like
Sky Dragon 12 doesn’t have guns, iirc.
1 Like
missiles are shorter range, if im not mistaken, it has a 12km range, also no gun and worse radar
I personally think that changing it to the HQ-17 is more likely to be achievable because bvvd wouldn’t need to add new models, only modify the radar model and other details based on the Tor-M1. It’s not that troublesome, and no one has submitted the HQ-17 air defense system yet. Of course, I support any new SPAA. Adding the Tor-M1 to the Chinese tech tree isn’t that reasonable; it should belong to the Russian Federation tech tree.
Really? Thought with how much people are complaining about China not getting the HQ-17, someone would have submitted it already.
You can check for yourself, indeed no one has submitted the HQ-17 to the developers. If someone had submitted it, why doesn’t it appear in this list?