Bruh, why not EVERYONE gets Pansir equivilent instead of not letting a tech tree get one because “WEsTeRn CoUntRY” doesnt have them.
5 Likes
1 is already dumb enough
1 Like
China should have gotten literally anything else besides the Tor.
Not only is it a PoS, but its not even a unique, domestic system and certainly isn’t a good enough SPAA to be a Pantsir equivalent in BR, all the while the actual Pantsir equivalents (FK-1000 and 2000) are nowhere to be seen.
+1
3 Likes
Yes! At MINIMUM they should have gotten the HQ-17A. Sure it is essentially a clone of the Tor, but it is at least domestic and swaps the tracks for wheels. The upgraded FM-2000 and HQ-11/FM-3000 could easily come after.
3 Likes
What’s the difference between FK-1000 and Sky Dragon 12?
1 Like
Sky Dragon 12 doesn’t have guns, iirc.
1 Like
missiles are shorter range, if im not mistaken, it has a 12km range, also no gun and worse radar
I personally think that changing it to the HQ-17 is more likely to be achievable because bvvd wouldn’t need to add new models, only modify the radar model and other details based on the Tor-M1. It’s not that troublesome, and no one has submitted the HQ-17 air defense system yet. Of course, I support any new SPAA. Adding the Tor-M1 to the Chinese tech tree isn’t that reasonable; it should belong to the Russian Federation tech tree.
Really? Thought with how much people are complaining about China not getting the HQ-17, someone would have submitted it already.
You can check for yourself, indeed no one has submitted the HQ-17 to the developers. If someone had submitted it, why doesn’t it appear in this list?
ASRAD-R in Sweden has AESA radar
Yeah but the ASRAD doesn’t have
1 Like
I don’t think it will make much difference to ground PESA radar in game, just similar performance of searching and lock all target at same time.
it’s modeled as normal radar.
1 Like
Chinese PGZ09 has AESA too
1 Like
However. It still doesn’t have
1 Like
This is a vehicle which should’ve been added alongside the Pantsir… Great suggestion, and I hope to see it in game soon. o7
1 Like
Bro, have you considered submitting the HQ-17? I’m willing to help gather materials and pictures.
I have, yes.
+1
this is suitable for China top SPAA
Now that we’ve seen how terrible the CS/SA5 is for top tier China, we need this SPAA to balance it out. It is not fair that only select nations can get good SPAAs. That is not balance. All nations including China should be a good SPAA system to compete in the top tier environment. I hope that the devs can seriously consider the addition of this SPAA to Chinese top tier.
3 Likes