You just contradicted yourself… the Mi-28a is op because it’s a lower br, and has the same ATGMs as the Mi-28N, which is a higher br, with the only true difference being a thermal.
Any 11.0 or 10.7 spaa should be able to decimate either. But the problem is the mi-28a is 10.7, which can see 9.7, in 9.7, it’s king. So Sweden bias I guess?
Also be careful with your “can” statements. Remember, 1 4000kg bomb CAN kill up to 30 tanks
“Of course it is not”
basic English would dictate if I said:
(Which means) You agree.
You may have more ATGMs, but a semi skilled spaa player will just nuke you. Mi-28N being 11.0 is far more likely to see spaa that will out class it in every manner.
It’s only “hopeful” brs are 10.3-10.0 which will only be seen about 20% of the time.
Because you’ll have equal range at those brs, and more ATGMs.
The MI-28A can both see 9.7 and has the same capabilities as the Mi-28N
I know that You want to debate much but can we really stop with this derail of the topic?
Not really as again I still have much more rockets to shoot at him and can use terrain to my advantage.
Not if we take into consideration of how game works as in enemy team there can be only 16 enemy players at the same time. If we want to talk about our imagination then we should switch the forum.
That is why Yak-9UT will always be more effective than one big bomb ;)
Moreover, there is a player on YouTube who plays better than 99.999% of the players on this forum, but for some reason he complains about aviation on almost every stream) Are you sure that only bad players complain about aviation?
Aren’t you quite pompous. Why are you against Tanks Only? Because obviously it’s a very popular idea. Are you scared you won’t get free points because people will actually pick to have fun instead of being spammed by AGMs?
Again your comments make no sense, unless you get the drop on an spaa and gun run it, the Xm975, gepard1a2, OsaAK, etc will just smite you from the skies, maybe not the OSA depending on the range.
this is the way someone talks when they have no reputation to lose. unfortunately despite that they can contribute stupidity to the conversation which dilutes it and denies the problem that is being discussed