sigh the range the range, literally no one does this and yes the do have the range. You can also shoot down their missiles since you have literally 10 + seconds to do so, its called using your brain or skill. I have never once had a situation where the plane was out of my range in any top tier spaa. Alarmist skill issue. Unless you are playing japan, italy, or isreal. But you accept that fate when you queue up.
yeah you abuse low br where spaa is useless then get owned in top tier, sounds about right
Sorry but I don’t even know right now what You are talking about.
Like the german top tier SPAA that has to reload after 2 shoots while the enemy can fire more than 2 rockets/bombs?
Owned in top tier?
Like with the Mi-28A with 4 K/D?
Or A-10A?
Sorry that I don’t touch the 14.0 airplanes, but seeing how other players are able to have really good K/D in them I don’t think that SPAA can do much about it.
it means i know what im talking about since I understand how to play, you dont. You abuse low br then talk about range of spaa when you have LITERALLY 0 EXPERINCE WITH. You are a padder trying to advocate for this astroturfed anti cas leddit movement. Maybe if you spent more time learning to play instead of crying on the forums you would be better served in your arguments.
your statements that said you think that spaa cannot deal with top tier CAS because they 100% can if used correctly. You would know this if you were a good player and not a low br padder.
So You can’t really answear what have been said, great.
Stats just debunk what You are saying, it is not a matter of what I think.
" According to our data, the balance at the top ranks of ground battles is noticeably shifted towards aviation and helicopters, and this balance has become even worse with the introduction of top aircraft this year. The situation where aircraft can attack tanks from a safe distance with impunity makes gameplay more boring for aviation and less fair for ground vehicles, a similar situation is with helicopters equipped with long-range fast ATGMs, or “fire-and-forget” ATGMs."
So is a UH-1B a problem? No. Why? The Spaa is far better than the helicopter.
Is the Mi-28N a problem? No. Why? The spaa is far better than the helicopter.
Is the Mi-28A a problem? yes. Why? It’s slightly better than the spaa at the same br (also has some premium Sweden bias).
Is the KA-52 a problem? Yes/ no. Why? It doesn’t put range any spaa, and usually is taken down by planes / spaa relatively easily. But like other CAS, left unchecked by CAP or spaa, it’s able to do damage.
Is the Tiger UHT, Israel Black Hawk, and others with FnF a problem? Yes. Because they can launch many atgm and hide, and be fine.
Are the top tier planes a problem? Yes. Long range capability across all nations that can annihilate. Ground units. KH-38s, brimstones, AGM-65s, AAMs, etc.
Thankfully the sp cost is getting higher, meaning less CAS
Are lower tier planes a problem? Absolutely. The revenge CAS is immense. Add in the fact, it’s not ever just 1-2 planes, it’s usually 3-6
You just contradicted yourself… the Mi-28a is op because it’s a lower br, and has the same ATGMs as the Mi-28N, which is a higher br, with the only true difference being a thermal.
Any 11.0 or 10.7 spaa should be able to decimate either. But the problem is the mi-28a is 10.7, which can see 9.7, in 9.7, it’s king. So Sweden bias I guess?