I do, I just don’t get upset by it and make statements that further cement people not even bothering to try…
They AREN’T out of range as you try make out…
He does, but he will argue out of spite.
You can provide videos and other kind of evidence, nothing works against empty words
4 Likes
Shhh, they aren’t out of range…
It’s not out of spite, it’s the fact you just argue to try make out someone is wrong so you can sit there all comfortable knowing no-one will take you on on the field.
The only one wanting to stay safe is the one proposing not effective counter.
I always say to use the air as it is the most Effective and can attack other air without range limitations
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
If You don’t kill the target it only means that what You use isn’t Effective against it, preatty simple
If what I show was cherry picked then my stats would show it, funny it doesn’t happen.
4 Likes
I do, but I’m honest about what happens in game
lol, just stop it ULQ… You got wrecked.
If that makes You feel better at the end od the day, so be it ;)
I think it’s about time you stopped to be honest… The planes listed are not out of range, and your wan to make out that I argue out of spite is just being inflammatory and insulting.
The fact you always do it is harrasment.
(Edit - Nope)
The Effective range of SPAA without radar is about 800m, bombers with bombing scope can Effectively bomb from around 1.5 km
It’s a fact that TO mode should’ve been added years ago. Seeing how the “combined” aspect gets shoved into your face in everything that isn’t Air mode is weird to be honest.
Years have passed and we still have a massive performance gap between AAs and planes at many BRs, which makes me believe that eco-system is here to stay. This is also ignoring the fact some people don’t really want to be shoot at by planes, an entity that they can’t do anything about in their tanks.
5 Likes
You have to choose one
What absolute hogwash…
Your ‘effective’ definition is way out of skew, and just based on your opinion.
The fact you have to keep trying to make out I’m wrong by any form of actual specification or definition, just shows you’re desperate to keep that berating down.
Nope… We don’t.
There are other options, be it ones you don’t want, there’s still many things that can be done.
(Edit - Nope)
Yeah, there is also third option - Remove ARB from the game, as it do not meets the combined arms criteria.
Because you will not be using double standards in your rethorics, right? …Right?
2 Likes
If You have to rely on others to do Your job it means that You are not effective, simple
Not when you’re part of the wider team…
Jesus, you really are lacking to be honest.
Everyone has a role in a team and again if someone has to do Your part then You are not Effective.
Preatty simple concept
This is rather an absurd throwout you commit to here…
What ‘rhetorics’?
What What?
Thing is you’re saying that those planes are out of range of those SPAA, and that the SPAA is inadequate off the bat… It doesn’t matter if you have air at hand, it’s the fact that you are saying that those things, that do fire at those ranges, are ineffective.
It’s pretty clear to see, you’re only making an argument because I am the one making statements…