Canadian Ground Forces Tech Tree

Just stop arguing with them, they won’t change their mind.

1 Like

Copy

Anyway, I found out why SK was pushing the K9 so hard.

With some promised rearmament, there is a want to buy 80 to 102 self-propelled howitzers. Also, a ground-based air defence system, unknown if self-propelled.

What happens with these, definitely need to keep an eye on, as it could mean more possible vehicles for the tree.

4 Likes

That cool

Stop guy but question do you have a vehicle suggestion?

1 Like

There isnt.
But its a cost benefit calculation.
Canada doesnt bring enough to justify being the next techtree.
There is still options for gajin that will payout way more.
If gajin adds canada it would be years away when there is nothing else left. But at the same time you already complain if canadian vehicles get added, just not where you want them.

1 Like

What would that even have to do wth anything?
What difference would it make?
I have a wiesel mells suggestion, but since germany is already a tree, there is no benefit calculation to be done. Its will only further increase money since the start is already done

Is this a vehicle suggestion or a tech tree suggestion

Both bro
for Canada 🇨🇦

1 Like

Pretty sure it says

And nothing about specific vehicle suggestions in the actual poll people are voting on

I’m just saying that most Canadian will defend the idea of a Canadian tree because many people think that we are a friendly nation who never helped or did anything during war…

4 Likes

I love the tree idea, some people say that it’s c&p but I don’t really care.

I play war thunder for player tanks from many nations and if I could play my nation it’s a + +

2 Likes

Yea I’ve been on this game 6 or 7 years and watched alot of videos on it b4 playing, what you said sums it up for me.

1 Like

Congratulation guys to another succesful vehicle addition. Seems like they will add a fancy skink.
If the german pack is anything to go by it will look great

2 Likes

I completely disagree with this line of reasoning. It does not make sense, operator nation trumps the nation that designed a vehicle’s predecessor.

4 Likes

okay, thats great and all, but there is no canada nation in the game

That’s probably why people make Canadian suggestions - to build up a good amount of knowledge on what Canadian vehicles can be added. Make the dev’s lives easier by saying “here’s something cool, here’s the background work and information.” That way they don’t have to spend time researching - they only need to validate the work.

When a big enough body of work is done, and Gaijin can say “we’re in a good position to commission this work, and don’t have anything in the pipeline” it’s much easier to gather the information - it has already been put together, along with good photos and technical specifications.

3 Likes

yes, but until that has happend

this stays a possibility

besides me thinking canada isnt worth enough for a standalone tree, but thats a different matter
honestly couldnt care less about the LAVs, i only stated a funny posibility that for the devs would be a reasoning enough

1 Like

Have to say i am a bit sad about the premium skink
image

They had so many options and the other ww2 premiums look like they got so much love, but this one is so basic sadly

1 Like

New LAV-6.0. Improvements from the Technology Demonstrator from last year.

https://x.com/GroundWarGeek1/status/1927732589927763975

3 Likes