Regardless of it being a sub or full tree, it definitely deserves to be added. +1
4 Likes
Also remember this (sorry if already posted).
Beute-Sturmgeschütz M42 mit 7.5 cm KwK L/18 850(i), alias the italian spg 75/18 M41.
7 Likes
South Korea and Canada start deals together, about the K9 Thunder
1 Like
I don’t see anything about deals started ya, just SK is offering their tech to us.
K9 is one of the things offering tho.
I saw it on the news, I send the link?
Sure, I just know of the video of them offering… If it’s in there must not have watched it all the way oops.
Imagine if they demanded the AS9 model and South Korea had Australia build it for Canada.
1 Like
Curious *if canada gets them if there will be any unique modifications that might change the designation
4 Likes
Indeed, at the very least it’s sounding like at least part of the fleet would be built in Canada if we get them.
2 Likes
considering the weather situations etc, i would think canada getting the norwegian configuration being more likely
I had a quick look over the Norwegian VIDAR and didn’t really see any special modifications mentioned due to operating climates. At any rate, the Australian AS9 Huntsman variant is based on the Norwegian VIDAR with further options added on, different armour etc.
I don’t think the Australian version is on the cards here, although it’s one of the most recent versions so any potential Canadian version may use some of its features. I just thought it was amusing the thought of one country building a tank for another country at the behest of a third country. Also, Canadian-ANZAC tech tree is something many people want. Further collaboration would only further the cause.
1 Like
Sadly they didn’t option the stuff that matters for War Thunder (LRF and thermal imager)
What makes you think that?
FYI
https://www.hanwha-defence.com.au/news/hda-signs-contract-with-safran-electronics-defense-australasia-for-land-8116
Oh nice
2 Likes
The Mack 6x6 25pdr looks awesome, a shame we don’t have more info on it.
As a side note, I just noticed the BR of the 25pdr vehicles are probably all way too high, not that it matters much for a suggestion.
I was going to point out how they should be pretty good, then I double checked and saw the Sexton II was 4.0, ya that a BR too high, but at least the Sextons should be fine in the 3.X range if a bit more like 3.3 and under.
With the lack of info on the Mack, I can’t say.
1 Like
Possibly id need to look into the performance of the AP rounds again
1 Like