You said that IFVs and ATGM slingers are bad at Ranks 4 and 5, and so I brought it up, there’s also the Leopards, Centurions, and Shermans at those ranks so…
As for C&P, then might as well get rid of Sweden, Italy, and Israel since they have C&P Centurions, Leopards, M-48s, and T-54s/T-55s.
God forbid Countries buy vehicles from other countries. That means that only the US, Germany, Russia, and Britain are allowed as tech trees due to little to no C&P.
It’s literally just Italy and Japan, so I dont get the big issue tbh.
sounds like a great idea, at least the vehicles maybe not those tech trees. Scartch that, we should get rid of Isreal
I dont get why you keep bringing up God, I get your live in canada and probably want your nation in the game, but this is not a holy matter to me. Its just about reason
This I agree with as CMP Trucks would make a big part of the WW2 BRs and then the LAVs for post-war.
In an old post on the WT Reddit, I saw people refer to Canada as “Allied Italy” and I agree. Canada’s strong points are Lights, TD and sorta SPAA mostly they are a handful of mediums but that is not the the big part.
It’s just a saying. You also stated how you might pray for Canada to never be added, as much as it may have been satiric.
And we’ve given reasons, some reasons make as much sense as to why nations like Italy, Sweden, and Israel are in the game, i’d even bring up China but that’s just scraping the barrel at that point.
So the reasons you’re stating are overshadowed by the fact that other ingame Nations have the same issue but yet they’re still in the game.
That’s what people are saying.
Canada focused more on Peacekeeping, unlike the US who’s in a war almost constantly so they’re upgrading constantly.
so if you say this Canada tech tree is gonna be just as bad as the other tech trees you keep bringing why should it be added. And what does this tech tree offer over those other. I can’t shake the thought you just wanna have your nation in the game, what ever the cost? I sure hope thats not the case, that would be brain rot lol
fair you got me there, I will admit, this has become a crusade to me now ;) Nah im kidding. I would not object to canadian vehicles being added if only they were atleast semi uniqe. Can we call that common ground, that you spoke of earlier?
You’re missing the main point here.
What difference would it make?
That’s what I’ve been saying, but you’re moving the goalpost when I state something and changing the argument.
“Oh there’s IFVs and ATGM slingers, so not good”
But most nations have IFVs and ATGM slingers at those ranges.
“Oh there’s too much C&P”
There’s literally Sweden, Israel, Italy, and China.
“Oh so now you just want your own nation in the game”
A lot of people want to see their own nation, it only makes sense.
It’s hard to reason if you’re not capable of giving valid reasons as to why Canada shouldnt be added due to fact that other nations have been added while having the exact same issues.
But yes, I can reason with adding semi-unique vehicles, which is why its nice to see vehicles such as the Ram Mk II and the QF 3.7 Ram ingame.
Alongside the various Canadian Leopards
I can tell you, even more IFV’s, atgm-carriers and recoiless rifles shooting heat-fs at rank IV and V. I was only wondering if you noticed this.
two wrongs dont make a right, neither does 10+
Yeah I happened to notice, but that appears to be the Ranks where we make that jump from APHE/AP (Britain and France) to HEAT-FS, unless you’re Sweden that has APDS and HEAT-FS at the lower ranks due to their tank designs
I thougt we agreed on this specific topic lol
I feel you are being just a tad bit disingenuous saying this. The point of a discussion is not to “win” its about being honest. And i feel we both shared our honest opinions, cheers to that
Hey guys, I think we’ve sort of run the course of the debate. Sure there are a number of vehicles that use hollow-charge weapons, but that is not bad in-of-itself. War Thunder gives precedent for that, and those vehicles are not without drawback.
There can be a good chunk of copy-and-paste, but that can also be entirely avoided as I illustrated in my first pitch with a “lean” tree. By no means does it require substantial copy and paste, but that can be used if you want more depth.
Leopard 2A6MC2 when
Oh boy…there we go again
I don’t think I posted this here before but I found a “8 “barrel” Smoke projector” that is supposedly linked to Canada.
*almost all photos are from that mapleleafup thread.
www.canadiansoldiers.com
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/military-history/history-heritage/official-military-history-lineages/lineages/infantry-regiments/governor-generals-foot-guards.html
Does anyone have more on this? As it’s something that could make the “C&Ps” a bit more unique.