There’s no limit on how many sub trees/nations a TT can receive
Its neither, i dont hate the swedish tech tree or top tiers, im js curious on why it was needed?
Thank for for telling me you have never touched sweden. I have enough info on that comment alone to know its going to be like talking to a wall.
Just explain…
Swedish TT is probably the second smallest one after Israel. Sweden barely has any low-mid tier vehicles. So in order to fill those gaps gaijin decided to add Finland.
1 Like
Why? Given how you reacted you’re reply will just be “thats not true nuh uh” sorry but i deal with enough people like you that im polarized to re-explaining the numerous problems but because top tier is the only focus its not worth trying to explain.
Fair enough
No? i just wanted an explenation and the other guy gave it and i understood why? im not like those ppl?
Explanation*
Tho it would be interesting like i said to maybe have a very small sub tree for USA and not as big as Italy with Hungary, Britain and Sweden
Ill give you a short one then look at sweden air and ground. Take away Finland and until about 10.0 you have maybe 1 decent vehicle per lineup in a pile of trash for the majority of the tree. The air tree is even worse, if you actually play it and dont go insane i congratulate you.
1 Like
Canada has a lot of unique vehicles. Adding Canada as a small sub tree would be a insult to Canadian vehicles and Canadian player base
3 Likes
Canada getting a home in WT would be a dream come true.
However, the US is the last place it should be. There are a number of reasons, between direct US vehicle making up a minority, to the US being a majority reason for Canada’s military problems(among other things that I can’t say due to forum rules).
If you want to limit C&P- UK, as not only is all of Canadian WW2 C&P from them(even the US stuff), everything Canada built during WW2, was for itself and the UK.
If you want to properly represent Canada, then new TTs are better. Either Canada alone or with the ANZACs works and is possible(and is the better option, frankly).
Else, the current treatment, well, not great, is better than being part of the US.
I’ll be frank, Canada in the US tree will be British C&P until 8.0 if they get anything. As the US tree already has all 5 lines filled and doesn’t need a sub-tree.
10 Likes
Canada + Australia . . . . there ya go . . .
maybe even throw in some Kiwi stuff to round it all out . . . . ☻
A “Commonwealth” tree if you will . . . it has potential
4 Likes
I don’t really see how Canada could give anything to the US besides Leopards. It’d be nice to see Canada somewhere else, though. I’d love to see it implemented with the “nation folders” suggestion.
And imma be real, I feel it’s a shame we’re denying nations simply because “they don’t bring anything new”. Their addition should not only be based on necessity, but variety and interesting stuff too. Canada definitely has some interesting vehicles like the M113 TUA, the Leopard 1C or the ADATS, but if we really want to see it all added in a proper way the subtrees must be reworked.
1 Like
May, I suggest you read up a few posts?
1 Like
You’re about 2 hours late :D
5 Likes
you expect me to read?
1 Like
I think a united commonwealth tree separate from Britain could work nicely.
I mostly just want Canadian vehicles to be added, and for them to not end up spread throughout 3 trees, with most of them being premium/event.
4 Likes