Fair enough
No? i just wanted an explenation and the other guy gave it and i understood why? im not like those ppl?
Explanation*
Tho it would be interesting like i said to maybe have a very small sub tree for USA and not as big as Italy with Hungary, Britain and Sweden
Ill give you a short one then look at sweden air and ground. Take away Finland and until about 10.0 you have maybe 1 decent vehicle per lineup in a pile of trash for the majority of the tree. The air tree is even worse, if you actually play it and dont go insane i congratulate you.
1 Like
Canada has a lot of unique vehicles. Adding Canada as a small sub tree would be a insult to Canadian vehicles and Canadian player base
2 Likes
Canada getting a home in WT would be a dream come tree.
However the US is the late place it should be. There are a number of reasons between direct US vehicle making up a minority, to the US being a majority reason of Canada’s military problems(among other things that I can’t say due to forum rules).
If you want to limit C&P- UK, tree not only is all of Canadian WW2 C&P from them(even the US stuff), Canada also sent all of WW2 building for itself and the UK.
If you want to properly represent Canada, then new TTs are better, either Canada by itself or with the ANZACs either works and is possible(and is the better option frankly).
Else the current treatment, well not great is better then being part of the US.
I’ll be frank Canada in the US tree will be British C&P untill 8.0 if the get anything. As the US tree already has all 5 lines filled and didn’t need a sub-tree.
6 Likes
Canada + Australia . . . . there ya go . . .
maybe even throw in some Kiwi stuff to round it all out . . . . ☻
A “Commonwealth” tree if you will . . . it has potential
2 Likes
I don’t really see how Canada could give anything to the US besides Leopards. It’d be nice to see Canada somewhere else, though. I’d love to see it implemented with the “nation folders” suggestion.
And imma be real, I feel it’s a shame we’re denying nations simply because “they don’t bring anything new”. Their addition should not only be based on necessity, but variety and interesting stuff too. Canada definitely has some interesting vehicles like the M113 TUA, the Leopard 1C or the ADATS, but if we really want to see it all added in a proper way the subtrees must be reworked.
May, I suggest you read up a few posts?
1 Like
You’re about 2 hours late :D
5 Likes
you expect me to read?
1 Like
I think a united commonwealth tree separate from Britain could work nicely.
I mostly just want Canadian vehicles to be added, and for them to not end up spread throughout 3 trees, with most of them being premium/event.
3 Likes
realest thing I’ve ever… wait a minute
1 Like
Realest thing youve never read
1 Like
reading . . . what a hassle . . . .
Oh Canada!
2 Likes
I kinda checked out as soon as I saw Canada and USA subtree tbh
1 Like
I’m personally against a Commonwealth tree, mostly because it a few nations to many, even if the ideal is Dominions+ India, that’s unlikely to happen, as it has 50+ nations with tech all over the world(even without the UK). Plus, mixing of east-west, with nations that are full one side isn’t taken well, see the reactions to the current Indian sub-tree.
I personally have a limit of 3 nations(well it’s more like two with the 3rd just their), 4 maybe.
I do agree with the second point.
1 Like
how about we remove india for the dominions
1 Like