What do you mean? For Canada in WT, or for suggestions to be approved?
If it’s for suggestions, the air tree is already out, which only took about a month(wait times were much better than).
For Canada to come to WT, as a tree of some sort, has been supporting it since I found it on the old forums, but didn’t become a hard supporter until Thatz new tree, so at least 898 days(likely longer).
Yes I was asking about this
That mean they took they idea but will take years to think about it?
Okay ima reply to this message because i wanna talk about the arrow. We know WT can add planes thats are lesser known we have seen it
Im probably not the first one to mention this but the canadian gov started declassifiing documents and releasing them a few years back. now we have access to somuch documents it would be easy to design a verry realistic plane. Pls wt add the arrow
https://nrc-digital-repository.canada.ca/eng/home/collection/avro-canada-cf-105-arrow/
A bunch of arrow information ia still classified sadly but theres a lot of information that ia public on the arrow
Centurion manuals are still classified in canada…
So I said I’d do this and I have:
For individual non-tree suggestions and vehicles under Canada on the forums/game, we have:
Aircraft:
29 open suggestions
1 passed to devs
Ground:
56 open ground suggestions
Naval:
22 open suggestions
1 passed to devs
Heli:
1 passed to devs
In-game:
17 total vehicles.
With 14 of those being unique (so not counting the duplicate Skinks or Ram II B)
Between the suggestions, there are 110 vehicles and adding the 14 unquie in game ones, there are 124 Canadian vehicles, at this moment between the forums and in-game. And the number can get higher as there is still plenty of both unique and vehicles Canada operated to suggest/add to WT.
I would have compared that number to nations in-game, but I couldn’t find a list of total vehicles per tech-tree.
Heli’s is something that is in a difficult position as the armament are really lacking since Canada never really got helicopters to be in a direct attack role, so it makes it difficult to really pitch it as a stand-alone thing.
Heli’s are a big issue.
It’s why I’ve mostly switched to a CAN-ANZAC supporter, as it’s one of their strong point, along with other points of use covering each other’s weaknesses.
Respectfully this is nonsense. Just because a certain vehicle is not yet in-game, it doesn’t mean it isn’t copy paste when the vehicle itself was designed, built, and operated by a foreign nation (Britain or Germany, for example), and was used by Canada either entirely or almost entirely unmodified.
You’ve classed the Centurion Mk 5 as unique, but it is not unique to Canada at all? It not being in-game yet doesn’t make it unique to Canada. If/when it does arrive to the game, it should obviously be added to Britain, as it is a British designed, built, and operated tank, and while a Canadian one could certainly also be added, it wouldn’t be unique, it would be a copy-paste of a British tank.
And Centurion Mk 5 is by no means the only example of you doing this here, a significant quantity of other vehicles fall under this category, foreign vehicles that are not at all unique to Canada, but you are counting them as such simply because they aren’t yet anywhere else in-game:
Probably some more that I’ve missed, this was at a glance.
You’ve done the exact same with the air tree too to inflate the number of supposedly unique vehicles, it’s rather disingenuous, and then you are surprised and defensive when people disagree with it?
How are you supposed to copy and paste something that isn’t even in-game?
And I’ve addressed that fact. I’ve already rounded down the number of unique due to missing vehicles in their home tree, and B, that chart is old and needed an update for a long time, but I’ve switched to support CANZ more.
Wow, it would be great if I had just taken the time to write out an in depth response explaining exactly this… oh wait, that’s exactly what I did, and I suggest you take the time to read it.
Trying to label something like the Centurion Mk 5 as a ‘unique’ vehicle for Canada, based purely on the fact it is currently not in an in-game tech tree, when it is a directly purchased/imported/‘copy-pasted’ (or however else you want to label it) vehicle from Britain, is nonsensical.
Since I have got your attention, can you maybe acknowledge this?
Already in the game as the M5A1 in several trees (Not Unique)
- Centurion Mk 5
Basically the Mk 3 with a 7.62 instead of a 7.92. Also is in game as the Sho’t (Not unique)
- Centurion Mk 11
In fairness this would be unique since the only Cent with a 105 and Meteor is the Mk 10 (and Strv 101) and the only Cents with the 105 and the old mantlet have the diesel engine. (Not wholly Unique)
- Leopard 1A2
Already in game. (Not unique)
Everything else on this list as mentioned are British vehicles (bar the Staghound) and would come to the British tree before any other nations.
By the fact that when these vehicles do come to the game they could easily just slap on a new texture and call it a day without having to do anything else (see M44, M55, Osa, Strela, Sherman, Chaffee, B-57, and finally the B-29 after 11 years YES I AM UNHAPPY ABOUT THIS)