honestly its bad at every BR, but at 7.0 it will have some chance because enemy doesnt have range finder to kill it instantly, as stated in the original comment
Of course I never played it; it looked bad from the beginning, so I didn’t grind it. You also never played LOSAT against WWII/post-WW vehicles, yet you still think it’s a good idea.
It might not work very well against modern tanks with composite armor/ERA, but anything from 6.0–9.0 (as you’re suggesting) is paper against LOSAT.
enemy doesnt have range finder to kill it instantly
Exactly why it shouldn’t face 7.0. How do you kill it with a Jagdpanther, for example? The distance is 1,470 m—you can’t even rangefind it. You need a couple of shots (at least two, unless you have 20k hours or an RGB gaming chair) to kill it. Meanwhile, the LOSAT turns on its Gen-2 thermals, aims at you, and kills you, because you have no armor against its missile. The missile is “bugged”? You’ve got 11 more coming.
You think it’s a good idea to put it at 7.0 because it has a “buggy” ATGM? Then put my ZBD-86 at 6.0. It also has paper-thin armor, its ATGM is extremely slow and starts shaking past 500 m, plus it’s only one missile instead of 12. Or take any early ATGM vehicle at this point—they’re all bad since Gaijin changed ATGM physics.
It’s just a bad vehicle; you don’t have to play bad vehicles.
Jagdpanther will finally have a proper counter outside of bombing? Well now that you put it like that, I’m all for LOSAT at 7.0
This tank isn’t good, moving such an advanced tank down to fight tiger 2s is also incredibly bad. It should not be downtiered.
Just say you aren’t good.
What’s next? I’m the worst player in Warthunder for hinting that maybe the Yak-9K might be in need of atleast a small nerf?
Remember all those times where you said if somebody complained about something that they just can’t handle fighting it and have a skill issue
Well this is double ironic cause the Jagdpanther is nowhere near overpowered yet here you are
Good to know he does not consider Yak-9K to be too powerful.