You can continue to be a moron all you want, no one is stopping you. But that doesn’t make you correct.
How did you find that out lol?
ROKN operates Wildcats with Spikes
But it is not Aim-120 and is in fact inferior to Aim-120 by quite a margin. Meaning the SAAF Gripen C has by far the weakest A2A fit of all the Gripen Cs.
Also. There is a reason why “MRAAM” or “BVRAAM” is usually used within conversation instead of the Technically correct AMRAAM term because it causes confusion. If I turn around and say “the Su-30SM carries 12x AMRAAMs” I am technically correct. But it will only cause mass confusion as AMRAAM has a rather specific conotation, especially on these forums. Likewise I would not say something like “the Su-57 can carry ASRAAMs” because that too would cause confusion even though the statement is technically correct.
Thats a maybe option then, providing korea doesnt go somewhere else. Again, not the first time Britain has been denied a loadout option found on the same aircraft operated by another nation just because its not in the British arsenal.
Hunter FGA9, F-4J(UK), F-111C, etc all are missing weapons that were used by the same airframes in other nations operation
1 Like
F-111C had quite a few differences to USAF’s F-111F’s. it goes both ways too, could ask for AGM-142 on F-111F in future since F-111C had them if that was valid reason.
we could get Fakours on USN F-14A and AAM-3 on F-15C by this
Us Aussies are getting Apaches too :D