Sad truth.
His final response gives me everything I need to know. He’s folded like a deck chair
His final response gives me everything I need to know. He’s folded like a deck chair
No, it’s because I’ve said everything which needs to be said, I don’t plan to waste time with people who don’t read my previous messages and make silly argument - went from saying the M1A1 is overpowered to showcasing the flaws it had yourself.
Arguing with a brick wall doesn’t get me anywhere, I’ve stated my opinion and facts and that’s all which needs to be said, the Merkava Mk.3 has one of the best APFSDS in-game (let alone for 11.3), excellent survivability and alright mobility - it’s perfectly fine at 11.3, cope kind child.
The Merkava Mk.3 tbf is pretty decent for its battle rating, Israel has more concerning issues other than getting some randoms tanks reload buffed
Mobility would be alright if it was at 9.3.
Israel has more concerning issues other than getting some randoms tanks reload buffed
Like their SPAA line, I totally agree that they need newer and better SPAA and that’s one reason which put me off from finishing their TT. There is also other ways to buff the Merkava Mk.3 if you want it improved so badly, I hate the idea of buffing vehicles via reload since it doesn’t really actually fix the problem at hand.
Not really, especially when you take into account Russian reverse speed, their forward mobility may be very nice but their reverse speed is appalling - you don’t really see Russian mains complaining about that?
Yes Israel struggles, but the Mk.3 definitely ain’t up there
Buff the armor, simple as that. It’s preforming horribly compared to how effective it was IRL both kinetically and chemically.
Having 18.5 HP/t is pretty bad for 11.3, it would only be average at 9.3. Top speed at 60km/h going forward is definitely mediocre where only it’s reverse speed should be considered good.
Yeah, Israel is really lacking Magach variants. Hope to see this underrepresented vehicle in War Thunder soon.
There was not one fact there.
That i have not disputed at all infact ive agreed with. But the dart alone does not make up for the poor reload.
That is absolutely false as I proved to you its survivability is horrific, its down there next to T series tanks.
Im not coping, at no stage did I say the merkava Mk3 was not fine at 11.3 I merely stated its one of the worst BR 11.3s and its only saving grace is the dart.
Thats something to take up with gaijin not us, thats literally how they balance stuff, prime example is the Shir 2 they gave it L23 which didnt exist until 1982 or 3 which is 4 years after the shir was readily discontinued and shelved. why, for balancing.
Are you kidding on? or just absolutely blind its one of the things every russian player complains about xD hell its one of the reasons ive yet to get the BVM or the 90M.
how is it not? isreal, britain and italy are the tied worst nations in the game xD theyre absolutely horrible above the 10.7 area, (ariete at 10.7 and CR1 mk2 and 3 are good)
especially when the tanks 65 tons it makes it unbearably sluggish for what it is movement wise.
at least the T90s and such are more nimble when moving forward
sabra mk2 when?
also why si the mk1 at fking 9.7 with the M322 round xD
Because the armor is weaker than rubber fabric screen against liner rounds, its mobility is awful (120S is worse), and its sights aren’t the best (but get the job done). It’s definitely a 10.0 vehicle however, but a round and gun don’t determine BR placement, multiple factors do.
This discussion is really interesting. A person who doesn’t have Mekawa 3 is bragging about how powerful Mekawa 3 is. When people check it, it turns into “I have a friend”. It is a reminder that Gaijin is not allowed to lend an account. Can someone show the account ID of “friends”? This seems to be a good evidence.
When discussing something irrefutable, it will become an exception that can’t be counted. There is a little cuteness like a child rolling around.
It can center mass early T-64 and early T-72s at most angles so it kind of dependent on what type of enemy shows up to make having that extra power useful compare to the usual suspect like DM33 and DM63 which is a common 105mm ammunition in that br that has no issue going through most things they see. If I’m playing Israel and the enemy team is USA and Germany and it’s uptier to 10.3, the Gal Batash and Sabra will perform pretty much the same as both vehicles have more than enough firepower to defeat the type of armor they faced.
It also make a short work of Leopard 2A4 when the M322 has access to any part of the hull, still cannot one-shot the 2A4 via turret cheek base on my experience, round struggle to pen the ufp of T-72B obr 89 and T-80s.
I think its more about the spall on M322, that round apparently nukes tanks compared to DM33.
Any shell that has more than 450mm penetration values can lolpen Leo2A4’s cheeks.
Thats because due to Kontakt-5 and not having anti-era ability many shells struggle to penetrate their ufp.
I know you like to confuse, so you don’t have to contact me anymore to waste time. If you are so confident in yourself, you can try to send out the ID of that account and let Smin @Smin1080p_WT or other Gaijin employees identify whether it is illegal.🤣
Regardless of it being legal or not, saying something is good just because you allegedly played the vehicle on another account isn’t an argument, it’s an anecdote that can’t really be confirmed to be true, so it’s bottom of the barrel when it comes to “arguments”.
Im aware of it still being a patton for mobility hance thr 48kmph.
However the megachs and sabra boast upgraded FCS , laser warning systems, good optics, thermals and as far as ive seen really good turret traverses etc.
I think the sabra should be 10.0, but its not what the topic is about and its not really a big issue of a tank
The composites are a joke though 100 percent
The round can ufp the t72B and t80B last i emphasized textchecked but maybe im wrong with that.
Dont get me wrong im not saying sabra is op af or anything just a quick comment on it.