Gotta love Eastern European subtree
2 Likes
Agreed, definitely in its current state. If it (hopefully) gets its fire on the move ATGM capability, I think it’s gonna be a solid rusher/flanker
2 Likes
wdym by slop?
2 Likes
Yk you should actually add the BTR
4 Likes
I always see they dislike their treatment since they cannot form their deck.
M1A1 on US, Leopard 2A4 CAN on Ger, while F/A-18 on UK,
AUS/CAN ground forces cannot get air support from their own.
Joke take: his issue is just that he doesn’t like Japan. /j
2 Likes
it’s utterly disgusting treatment and I’m Australian, we don’t have it anywhere near as bad as Canada… so far, I’m dreading what they will do with our Leo AS1s, Mirage 3s, Tiger ARHs etc.
2 Likes
Regardless the btr acts well or not it’s a operated vehicle by Thailand hopefully every vehicle by every nation will be added good or not your chase for the best shows how narrow minded you are I don’t know what’s happening ego or patriotism or just stupid it’s an actual vehicle used, I a Japan main now I despise the low br tanks but I wouldn’t want them gone because I’m not dumb enough to ignore that they have their place in history and certain players enjor them if you even play Japan your want for the btr not to be added is dumb any addition is welcomed and the majority is against you opposing your opinion .
1 Like
I feel like the idea that every vehicle should be in the game solely because it exists is part of the reason this game is in such a poor state from pervious years, there are plenty of vehicles that just do not need to be in the game or the efforts the devs spent designing them could’ve better been spent elsewhere, both the F-117 and almost every howitzer in the game are great examples of this. So is the BTR-3. Adding every type of vehicle to every single tree doesn’t make the game any more enjoyable, it just makes it more soulless, a lot more than back when Tech Trees actually had any form of uniqueness to them. I Started this game originally in 2019 or so to play Russian Vehicles because of their design characteristics, not because of their politics. It makes me want to play the game less and less when i see Russian and or soviet derived vehicles placed on other tech trees for the sole reason of politics or because a different country made one hyper specific part of it Not to mention there’s a pretty large double standard with how its okay for Taiwanese vehicles( that aren’t by any capacity Chinese designs ) to be placed on China, yet its somehow illogical for a Soviet derived vehicle using soviet derived equipment on a soviet chassis to be placed on the soviet tech tree.
(TLDR) This game has ruined the uniqueness of the countries within it by adding countless vehicles that do not belong within them and take up the space for more unique vehicles, making almost every tree outside of a select few feel bland and repetitive.
2 Likes
So VT4 is coming soon then too, right?
5 Likes
They’re adding a vehicle to a BR and tree that they know doesn’t need it, simply because it’s easy (made from already existing models) and it’s famous, being a Ukraine vehicle.
Lol what?! The hull and turret are both new to warthunder
7 Likes
They’re adding a vehicle to a BR and tree that they know that Thai needs it, and you don’t like it.
Adding the Thailand vehicle to japanese tree is irresistible, since they are a sub-tree of Japan.
If we don’t add any vehicles from Thailand while they are acting subtree of Japan, why should we keep them as subtree of Japan?
5 Likes
Best vehicle of the patch
1 Like
Finally an interestng machine. Too bad its for Japan but eh, whatever. While it`s unique its fine
Cant agree more
NGL I’m surprised how Thailand discourse returned this quickly
1 Like
Since when was Thailand a standalone tree?
On your point where multiple countries own the same tanks prime example sherman the majority own them some even questionabley better it’s either because they were captured in real life or bought so in that sense they would be there, the oplot t is a direct export for Thailand so does this mean the Thai can’t have them because it’s Ukrainian ? Yet it only exists with its specific changes to the oplot, look at the trialed oplot m Pakistan oplot they should of got completely different the side protection and lack of an air con unit on the back of the turret, now with the few images of the Ukrainian oplot again different with the upper turret why is so hard to understand they’re three different tanks essentially as they wouldn’t of been made had it been for only Ukraine and I guarantee the btr for Thailand like the oplot t would of had climate appropriate mods done you want nations to only run what they have then go play blitz or wot this game uses concepts, trial vehicles, ideas and brings them to the game mabye when they shouldn’t exist or bring value but you know what great I’d rather grind a soul crushing tank to get to where I want because it’s better to have then not have at all, heads up since it may not have clicked Thailand is gonna bring some interesting vehicles “copy” or not and for those wanting to play the Japan tree there’s no downfall either you hate the fact Thailand uses Ukraine vehicles and the many others or you can’t accept Thailand possess these vehicles is it hate pride or something else if Thailand was in Russia I’m sure you’d be chuffed because yes that makes sense historically if you can’t even understand what I just referred to this comment is wasted.
1 Like
Will you stop nitpicking reply for at least five minutes?
It is okay if you dislike the addition of BTR-3E1
However, it is not okay that you gatekeep the addition of Thai vehicles.
2 Likes
Yeah I don’t think his issue is any specific point, but instead just that it’s not an addition he cares for. Of course he’d rather see another vehicle if he doesn’t want to play this one. Maybe he doesn’t even play the nation and is worried about facing it, only he’d know really.
I think the best response to this was already given.
2 Likes