I’m pretty sure Lambda compensation being fully modelled would be a nerf if anything.
It still puts the missile in lead pursuit.
Would an AtA missile ever be anything but lead pursuit?
Collision pursuit
That’s just proportional navigation guidance. All Lambda Compensation really does is reduce steering commands at the start of flight to stop the missile pointing so far ahead that the target leaves the seeker gimbal limits.
Yes what about the 45 G pull when all 4 find are aiding
thats 2 plane pull, gaijin doesn’t do that
only gets modelled for missiles that actively pull into the 2 plane pull,
due to the basic design of the AIM-9 (rollerons) it is physically impossible for it to
Unless a plane is flying directly 90 degrees to the missile when turning more than 2 fins will pull
And unless it is perfectly at 45° to the plane of the fins it will not pull 45 g.
It will pull a value between 32 and 45 depending on angle.
⠀⠀
I reported that and they threw the report out because apparently 30g is close enough.
3 Likes
Selective realism again
6 Likes
In all fairness you didn’t use this snip I don’t think.
You used the average engagement process.
That’s irrelevant. They did not object to what the g-load actually was, they just said that they do not plan to change it because they have rounded it to a round number:
It does not require any changes, similar to the fact that we round off some values, for example, the AIM-9J also has 20G, not 22G.
2 Likes
I see,
Missile does not meet it’s absolute minimum performance - gaijin that’s fine
Have you tested launch envelopes?
What’s hanging in the middle of the belly of this aircraft? I didn’t see this in the U.S. version. Is this an anti-radiation missile pod? (Okay, I know this is an IRST pod)
3 Likes
Oooo we get the IRST pod.
Oooo 12 AIM-120D AMRAAMs
5 Likes
I wonder if it will be useful in game
