Didnt the Falcon have target tracking irl? They could add that to make it way more useful as an SPAA
yep, and a LRF,
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SYYKuwQiQf1Q
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SXHi6awMTul4
1 Like
This seems like the obvious solution
Remove APDS and add target tracking
It’s an SPAA after all
That, or reduce it to a BR where an SPAA is needed (7.7)
1 Like
Im happy with either, although there are several options Britain could get to fill the gap
Scorpion S530 for example with twin 20mm cannons on a mobile chassis
The Fox/Ferret Mk.V SPAA variant with a 20mm autocannon could go at 6.0 to replace the Skink, which is dogsh*t
6 Likes
It does not have a radar
oh, is that a hatch?
The Vickers Valkyr could take its place then
4 Likes
It could probably go to 7.3 as well, pretty similar to the 23M2 without the APDS
That is indeed a hatch
1 Like
Maybe it could be ~6.7 then
Ooooh, that second one would be a lot fun
British R3 T20 FA-HS
1 Like
Which Hawk 200 users had a radar installed?
If you are referring to the Japanese Premium one. Its been reported.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/izI9Jxli24Zu
1 Like
All Hawk 200 users iirc,
1 Like
That was what initiated my search yes but i was meaning just in general.
1 Like
Hawk 203 (BAe video on Hawk 203, radar calibration rig shown ~3:20), Hawk 208, and Hawk 209
i.e. they all have a radar
1 Like
Thankyou.
This is why discreet bug reports ain’t always best.
So basically it turns into a sidam 25?
a SIDAM 25 with a lower rate of fire, no APDS, not on the m113, 30mms not 25mms, 2 guns not 4 guns
it would be very similar but worse overall