British Weapon Systems - Technical data and discussion

theres more than reason to anonymise BRMs after the Trickzzter incident

1 Like

image

Is that a spall liner on the inside of the engine bay door or some kind of thermal insulation?

6 Likes

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IGnvylXxx2qw


You’re gonna need a classified source definitively stating the exact gear ratios for that one…

1 Like

It’s gotta be the same bug reporting manager that keeps doing this stuff

6 Likes

I know, but it’s a big rather than a technical report…

1 Like

Boxer RCH 155

2 Likes

Reports not based on any source are unacceptable.

Except when its nerfing a NATO vehicle of course
image
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RuPCHKHo71e6

13 Likes

BOL was similar.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Gbo81azOGwV3

The report that nerfed it basically just went “these cartridges are small, therefore BOL flares must be small and should be nerfed”

completely ignoring the fact that BOL are not flares.

I still cannot beleive that report even got accepted, let alone actioned

5 Likes

So for the “neutral steering” reports what source is required… it’s the same style of bug I am reporting…

1 Like

doing my best for that, i don’t know the exact ratios but the official page suggests that it has a torque converter, meaning it should have more gears which therefore will help the situation in the gear 4-5 area

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SWNqOxwTs9uU

image
cherrypicking really doesnt look good


also on the topic on bug reports - who tf thought that a goddamn m3 lee derivative could have a 800 hp engine?
how the hell did this pass

Its not cherrypicking if I link to the whole bug report. smh.

99% of people cant even be bothered to click a link
the whole

is just manipulative

Lol ‘manipulative’ who am I trying to manipulate? Am I incorrect? Did the Devs enact a bug report that was based on 0 sources or not?

image

*99% of people cant even read

That source though has no numbers for the turret rotation speed it’s just based on a hunch

Because its citing a source that confirms it had it? I’m not sure what you’re getting at;
image

4 Likes

this makes 0 sense
the ram is powered by the r-975


i know that tank encyclopedia is not a good source, but why the hell would this one particular variant of the ram recieve an engine that is twice as powerful? to me it looks like the source is mistaken (the guy writing it probably heard “ram is powered by a plane engine” and just went with this for some reason)

pretty sure the cyclone was never used in any ground vehicles? i could be wrong tho