I think they’ve forgotten about these two reports.
Something tells me we wont see the martel get it for “reasons” such as “but the Bucc BR would go up” ignoring that pretty much everything else it does, other planes do better or you can just uptier the S.2 version for toss bomb fun anyway.
I do hope we get Martel with it, but I am not going to be shocked if not.
Can’t we KH-38 it?
Y’know, find some really dodgy blogpost and blurry photo that says the Bucc actually carried ALCM or something similarly comical? …
Wait a minute chaps, I’ve just got an idea. Opens up MS Paint. Cue the A-Team Music
Okay gents. I have found in my not-inconsiderable personal archive a marketing image of the Buccaneer S.4L
This has Olympus Engines (trust me bro), full supersonic capability and a highly advanced Stealth Coating that looks suspiciously like EDSG but really isn’t. Plus it has tactical lasers under each wing.
I think you will all agree that this matches and indeed exceeds the evidence given for the KH-38MT.
I shall be taking no questions.
6 Likes
It’ll be a peak Gaijin-moment if the Martel gets no datalink, but the Bucc still has to carry the giant datalink pod with Martel
Looking forward to Wildcat coming to the tree in future now it will have functional Sea Venom and maybe Spike NLOS/Exactor.
I wonder if we can argue for limited FnF Brimstones.
Mark a target with a laser, the last Brimstone fired becomes FnF onto that target when it gets within 9ish km.
Essentially what this mechanic will do for all other missiles its being added too, but they only need to keep LoS with the weapon not the target.
1 Like
The response to players asking for Brimstone to get it’s mmW guidance, even if that means giving it an artificial nerf and letting smoke obscure the seeker to keep it in line with TV/IR guidance:
Meanwhile gaijin happily admitting to artificially withholding MITL mechanics from ground vehicles in the interest of balance:
This is a single example, but there are countless other examples of Gaijin artificially nerfing something in the interest of overall game health. There is no reason whatsoever that the same thing can’t be done with FnF brimstones, it simply seems to be a headscratching double standard currently.
(Note - this is NOT asking for Brimstone to get their mad dog / LOAL capability. That would indeed be broken but is a completely different ballpark to mmW FnF capabilities)
1 Like
Whenever the argument came up they would put these two together, acting as if they were inseparable. The fact you have to mention it shows lol.
Yeah.
“We never artificially nerf things”
Reduces BOLs effectiveness by 75%
3 Likes
The post for the dev forum regarding Brimstones is ready to go. Their arguments look really really stupid when laid out clearly.
(and I think we should also expect AJ168 too.)
All tank smoke grenades block TV and IR guided munitions, to my knowledge this isn’t the case for all smoke grenades irl?
So why not just make all smoke grenades block MMw? If it’s already not realistic what’s the issue?
Pantsir SM will mince them all regardless.
2 Likes
Precisely the argument that Gaijin ignores and shoves their head in the sand whenever anyone mentions it
I think you are barking up the wrong tree in response to this devblog. At best, this new MITL business gives you very rudimentary LOAL for a single munition at a time, requiring some manual fiddling and a maintained LoS. This is very different to actual full LOAL like mode 3 Brimstone, where the entire payload can be ripple fired from behind terrain and acquire targets smartly and automonously without the launch aircraft ever once exposing itself.
What we should be arguing for is mode 2 Brimstone, which requires a lase to initiate the lock, and then once the Brimstone is launched guidance can be handed over to the mmW seeker. With appropriate balancing of mmW seeker capabilities (for example, partial or full obfuscation by smoke) this would be no different to current FnF capabilities provided by IR seekers, and in fact it would be slightly worse, as the initial lase would trigger the LWS for tanks that have it, unlike IR munitions, where there is no warning whatsoever.
1 Like
Thats what Morv has been doing for the past 2h or so
Which is precisely what im arguing for. Mode 2, not Mode 3.
But Mode 2 was denied because it was still LOAL.
But it isn’t? Or at least it could be realistically implemented not to be. It is switching from one guidance to another, but it isn’t only acquiring guidance after launching, which is LOAL.
Tell that too Gaijin. But thats what we were told so far every single time we argue for Mode 2 Brimstones.
Actually, its getting to the point where I think they dont understand Mode 2 even exists and the Brimstone is either Mode 1 or Mode 3.
It is indeed mmW guided
Supersonic sized golf ball was what I heard 😅
1 Like
currently all SAL weapons are LOAL, mode 2 would work with half a second of lasing once the missile is close enough.
Plus Brimstone SAL seeker has 10km range, so even if you managed to get the missiles to refuse to launch unless they can see a laser you’re locked to sub-10km launches, and if the mmW takes over at 9km then a 10km launch will need 1-2s of lasing. Sub 9km and it may as well be mmW only.
On top of that, what happens if you try and launch a second Brimstone while the first is in the air? the FoV is 30 degrees, would it pick up the new lase and switch target or would re-lasing be impossible once it goes active?