its gear ratios were wrong, they’re being corrected
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/o6iflyoOMrG4
that bad :(
Still no change to the GBT 155 yet, sadge to the Nth degree.
Where do the ingame AI.24 stage2 range values come from?
“hprf”: {
_______“sideLobesAttenuation”: -20.0,
_______“power”: 2000.0,
_______“band”: 8,
_______“rcs”: 5.0,
_______“range”: 125000.0,
125km [67 NM] for a 5m^2 target is much longer than than the stage 1s range values(~45 Nm [83km] for a 5m² target)
I believe you will find that range graph is for the Z-list version of AI.24 which, while marginally better than the previous prototypes, had terrible performance problems and quite literally barely worked IRL. The Stage 2G radar we have in game performed vastly better than the early versions of AI.24 (basically anything before Stage 2), which were infamously terrible.
2 Likes
@Gunjob hello, I remember you posted a diagram about the Terma pod for Tornado where it interacts with the RWR. Can you find it again?
Thanks, I found this controller in the Terma catalog… But here’s the question - can it work with the F-16 RWR and PIDS+?
If it has ALQ-213A as part of its install yes.
Same thing. Difference in names/designations is down to different hardware arrangements depending on how the customer wants the control unit and peripherals installed in a particular airframe. Functionally they’re all the same capability
European F-16s for example, have this setup
1 Like
Can you send link?
.pdf specifically mentions that there is a US (ITAR restricted) and Danish (non-ITAR) version
Can see footage of a Danish F-16A MLU with the EWMU installed in the cockpit here:
Also a document about installing it on F-16C, A-10 etc. to replace the old EW controller
Unless I am misreading it looks like the AS-90 RoF has been corrected/buffed? Good news there.
Vickers GBT 155 however yet to be touched.
in what way was the as90s rof buffed
they look to still be untouched in that way…
They should be getting the same reload rates.
should
if the GBT doesnt it really needs to be lower than AS90
When I looked at the AS 90 prior it was based on crew skill though now at least for the initial rack is working on an autoloading rate of fire? (EG it would show 5.4 seconds based on crew with 5 seconds aced, now its just showing a flat 5 seconds for me)
oh yeah my bad yes they did change that on the AS90 its just 5 second no matter what now for the ready rack atleast
ooof looks like they’ve modelled the entire indirect fire control computer as FCS on the AS90