I don’t think it would be unfair if they just balance it with stupid reasons like “We can’t put 16x CM-502KG because it collides and clips through the landing gear”, same they can do to reduce the amount yet keeping the full working ordnance, in my most personal opinion I support this to stop the whining with threads like “Why x weapon is better than y weapon”.
😶
IIRC either nigeria or ghana bought FV721 foxes with the electric traverse drives so we would get what the fox was again.
poor choice of words considering how my country is nowadays… but i agree with booting india out for the more friendly commonwealth realms
1 Like
I am obligated to doubt the existence of the New Zealanders, after all, that Island is just a lesser island of Australia.
1 Like
I’m going to disagree with this, just because I find a commonwealth tree has too many nations. And Gaijin can barely add two nations into one tree without doing one wrong.
If the suggestion mods could continue their steam, we could see a suggestion that I helped Paulie with that I find has as many nations needed without going for too many.
ahahhah…
1 Like
Pakistan would have been a more interesting addition to the tree than the Indians tbch. Would have introduced some more interesting kit to the pommie tree than what we’ll end up getting copy pasted from the Indians. India has some cool kit, but there’d be blood if they added any more of it to the Brit tree I would wager. E.g. Arjun
Shhh, people don’t realise the number of commonwealth members, and if we keep it that way we can get a huge boon to the pommie tree.
1 Like
that would be even more controversial as far as national relations go ngl…
Pakistan is right to be a chinese subtree. India probably should have been left on the fringes as skins for vehicles, or in the case of the marut put in germany because the “not a nazi” argentinian guy that designed it
People would get over it compared to if we get any of the interesting kit from India. It would effectively cause as permanent a complaint as Australia folk do about having our Abrams in the yank tree, but with numbers that actually could impact the bottomline instead of just being minor griping.
Would have been better to get a nicer commonwealth, but they seemed inclined to upset everyone with the India decision, so at least Pakistan would have had less of a detrimental effect.
I don’t really care as long as the Canadian leos are not in the US tree
1 Like
all it would be is slop from the american or chinese tree. it would be just as foulmouthed as the 10.3 SPAA spam
1 Like
But yeah, the CF-188 is great in the British tree but without leos or lavs…it’s sad
My opinion:
Step 1) Fix the Challenger 2
Its only a bad tank because Gaijin deems it a bad tank, and thus artifiicially nerfs it
Step 2) Decompress top tier. There is at least 1-2 full BRs at 12.0. Tanks like the Leopard 2A7 should not be at 12.0. They should be more like 13.0 or higher
Step 3) Bolster our line-up. Sky sabre was a good start (if it ever gets fixed and becomes usable) but we need a proper top tier IFV like the AJAX and or BLACKJAX
Step 4) Bolster our CAS. We use to be good in that department, now we dont have anything good. AH-64E with FnF would help. But we also need the Typhoon FGR4 and Tornado GR4 to not be artificially nerfed so much. And the Harrier GR9A would be lovely.
Step 5) Add Challenger 3(P). Challenger 3 with actual armour, Spall liners, equipment, etc etc. What the CR3TD should have been ,rather than the weakest tank at top tier
And thats how you fix Britain. Sub-TT and C&P leopards arent needed. Britian is perfectly capable of standing on its own. Sure a single Canadian Leopard 2A6 or something, would be fun purely for a Canadian line-up, especially with a LAVIII as well. But totally unnecessary in terms of balance and should come after native additions and overhauls
2 Likes
And…no… premiums!
Eh, I find CANZAC(Canada-Australia-New Zealand) is more than enough for a tree. Not only can C&P be kept to a bare minimum (aka major historic vehicles/MBTs(because few nations have unique MBTs due to how much the high cost to make)). Even more so, when looking at the tree suggestions for the ANZACs(4 line air and ~3 ground) and Canada(5 both air and ground).
Plus, relations aren’t so great between the major commonwealth (non-UK) members, too. Like Canada & India haven’t been on friendly terms for some time now.
1 Like
CF-188 is great. not gonna lie i think it alongside the swiss and american 12.7 premiums probably should go up to 13.0 its crazy good. I have no idea what the americans and germans were coping about when the hornets were added at first
isnt new zealand that place the sydney harbour bridge goes to?
1 Like
The brimstones were only tested, they will just get the AGM179 since UK bought them.
They never had to deal with the Tornado F3 and therefore consider anything with minor weaknesses as being DOA.
Im not gunna get the CF188, but im intrigued when I eventually unlock the 2x TT ones to see what all the complaining is about.
1 Like
Which is technically more than enough. Plenty of examples of “tested” being suffecient (heck more than what exists for the KH-38MT) but without either:
A) Brimstone 2s that they refuse to add for the Tornado or Typhoon
or
B) MMW
JAGM-MR (which for the record. Have never been tested on any Apache from what im aware) is still the best option
1 Like