thank you that is funny
1 Like
Yeah I’m not a fan of Swedens “we tested it so we get it”, weirdness, being a combined Norway/Finland/Sweden tree should have created enough options already surely. Would have suffered slightly in Helicopters but tbh everyone for years has suffered under KA-52s, that doesn’t mean everyone should suddenly have KA-52s. T-80 U is just silly, should have been Leopard 2A4NO or something, just give it DM33 rather than 23 and it’d even be the same BR.
1 Like
Aye, whats more amusing is they went out of their way to give them meta squadron stuff, if they had done that for the brits we should have got an ozzie abrams that the yanks got or a potential Canadian leo, both offer things the challys don’t in terms of mobility, but instead we basically got another chally at a br with no support other than uptier, and worse reverse speed XD
1 Like
LoL, no one in the UK cared at all, Gaijin made it a thing no one cared about, and its featured vehicle was the endless Challenger 2。
Gaijin only paints a rosy picture of the future in order to trick players into spending money and time in this “grave” for an invisible future, which is too sad
Although Gaijin is just giving away a T-90 tank that is not so good in the powerful Russian Federation, it is still a good complement to the poor British in Warthunder, at least better than the Challenger 2
1 Like
It wouldn’t be better though if gaijin accurately modelled the Challenger 2.
3 Likes
Even though the Gaijin for us to turn a blind eye.
If this had been possible from the beginning we wouldn’t be here complaining about nothing. sad
I don’t like the turn this game is taking, the British TT doesn’t need a T-90 because it can’t do anything with a BR 10.7 tank, what other vehicles can it team up with? You will see that the next victim will be the French TT who will be delivered an Algerian T-90.
4 Likes
This is the biggest part people seem to be missing, it doesn’t add to the tree because there is no actual way to use it in a lineup without gimping the rest of your line up by up tiering them to the inevitable 11.3.
Exactly my point.
You do not have any sort of lineup. Either you blast your Chally Mk.3, Stormer, Vickers Mk.7 lineup into tiny shards when you get uptiered to 11.3 and 11.7 with your T-90, or you just don’t play it. that or you take it to 11.3/11.7 with a Chally 2 lineup and get blown apart anyway.
1 Like
Ig ill go Ask for T90m for the USA, cv90 for Russia and M1A2T for China.
Its a joke instead of adding something influenced by Britain or Interesting developed by the British they just slap a Tank that is built by Russian/India from a nation that is know to be iffy about its colonial history with Britain into the British tech tree…
Sure its ‘funny’ to do some trolling to your own community but imo in the long run its just boring and cheap.
2 Likes
due to egypts history as a French and then British colony from 1798-1956 we shall now add the Egyptian airforce Ka-52 to the french and british TT. :)
3 Likes
We were playing this game in the R&R thread. What could be added to the British based upon the now set prescedants
We got
Mig-29/Su-30, Pantsir (and Ka-52 was trialed) from India
F-16 from New Zeland (they nearly acquired it)
F-15 from Singapore
F-18 from Canada or Australia
Leopard from Canada
Abrams from Australia
Tor-M1 (and I think Mi-28) from Cyprus
Gripen from South Africa
Basically, name a vehicle and I think you could find a commonwealth connection for it.
US could also get Spanish Typhoons via South America association
I mean ground wise? Off the top of my head other than the ones you already mentioned:
MBT-2000 from Pakistan, Burma and Bangladesh. Leclercs from the UAE and Jordan. Leopard 2SG from Singapore. T-55s/Type 59s/Type 69s/T-72s from about 15 different countries.PT-91s from Malaya. M60A1/3s from Oman and a few others. Centauro’s amd Pantsirs from Oman. VT-4, Type 85 and T-80UD from Pakistan, VT-4 again from Nigera. BMP-3s and BTR-3s from UAE, M1A2 Abrams, M-84s, T-90MS, Desert Warrior, BMP-2s and 3s from Kuwait.
If you want to extend the plausibility a little further to shorter (or longer ago) occupations anything from Israel, 2S1s, 2S3s, Pantsirs, BMP-1s 2s and 3s from Iraq, and anything from West Germany, and finally of course anything from the US tech tree.
2 Likes
Seems the mantlet of CR1 was buffed too? At least according to what this guy says. Amusing how much better protected CR1 was than 2 in the roof/mantlet aspects, now it’s even more exaggerated. Not to complain of course, CR1 being modelled more realistically is splendid.
.
From this report: Community Bug Reporting System
2 Likes
Forget that, F-16 from Singapore or Jordan who actually operated it if we’re going to be that guy with Commonwealth. (Although, Commonwealth would be appreciated to bolster the air a little if you ask me.)
At least that’s a Warrior, and a good step up over the current one War Thunder-wise. I’d love to see it.
1 Like
Yeah, dont get me wrong. I dont want any except maybe a few Export versions of the BAE Hawk. But it was a fun hole to dig gaijin into after the T-90
1 Like
I would be happy if gaijin add Canadian or Australian F-18s or India’s Tejas for British.
Hey look I’d like a Hornet as much as the next guy, but honestly would prefer the Eurofighter a bit more
They have only officially added the SA Sub Tree to Britain, Smin denied that they had an Aussie/Canada Tree to continue to justify the poor addition of the T-90S that contradicts Aim/Canadian Leopard/Swiss Hunter and they’ll continue to play that angle to deny access to vehicles.
Gaijin INSISTS the T90S fills a gap that the challengers don’t. Well the Indian MiG 29 fills a gap that the Tornado’s don’t… Wheres that?
7 Likes
The lack of line-up is upsetting, the only way i see myself playing it when the time comes to spade it is one death leaving, with perhaps a plane/heli, or uptiering it to 11.3, as i am not going to uptier my early challys, as that potential downtier is what keeps that lineup alive XD