Eh… thats just the French for you, they’ve been like that since Agincourt
slamming on the stop at the line, just miffed
Yeah that’s because it was a cold start, the other version of it this with the engines warmed up Leclerc wins easily.
Fair enough, though I still think the chally 2 isnt quite right in its mobility, especially its acceleration.
I think what’s missing to make it more realistic is regenerative steering.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/14x6tmh/regenerative_steering_was_passed_to_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=1
Yeah, totally agree, its literally the top of my list, but thanks for the reddit link, its a good demo, i’ve added it to the thread
@Headnaught is Tree Coordinator info shared with you guys as moderators? I think it’d genuinely be worth seeing if we could engage with them and give them ideas.
It is, as they say, if you want something done, you’re best doing it yourself. With the greatest respect to the guys doing the modelling and designing Brit vehicles if we don’t have some sort of constructive dialogue going on with them they’re going to be completely in the blind.
Basically my point, it would be benificial for both parties to be in comms
you mean… the suggesstion forum?
No there is a different role in gaijin called the Tech tree coordinator, The italians have theirs in their server, and the chinese grouped up and protested until theirs was fired. The suggestion mods have no real power, where as the coordinator is the guy who suggests things for gaijin to add. the issue is they just seem to be nudging challys along, where as the swede one for example is an utter metahound
Im pretty sure the UK tree coordinator has seen most of our ideas.
I would hope so, but how can we tell, they ligit might not even be engaged with the forum and community, which based on the wall of challangers we receive, and vehicles that are effectively pointless that might be the case
Im very much certain that they are but you also have to remember the tree co-ordinators do not have final say on what vehicles get added if the devs want to go in a certain direction they can
Regardless there is an issue though, so it would be better to know for certain they are not the root cause of this manic mismanagement, so we can focus out suggestions in the correct direction.
Like looking at this leak hinting at hte foland gnat, they have just gone out of their way to shove a indian t-90 into the brit tree. But becuase sweden is metahounded to the moon, i would not be surprised to see it added in the fin line, even if the british community have been asking for it consitantly since 2015. Its like someone at gaijin somewhere along the line just doesnt want britian to have the stuff they manufactured or used in abundance, with the auspice of getting something later that then never manifests, case and point the light tanks and ifvs
said post for the gnat so you can see how long its been requested
Would have been good if we had gotten it when relevant, about 8 years ago, but i fear its all britain is getting this update
Unfortunately I think it’ll be a case of DOA if it goes at 9.0 like ive seen suggested. Granted its got a very nice TWR but 2 ADENs at 9.0? it doesn’t seem like a good addition now, at least not without some Decompression
I’m aware but I would hope that the Suggestion Mods and Tech Tree Coordinators have a bit more weightiness to their suggestions when they say to the Developers “hey, we think this should be added because so and so reason”
Still, it can’t hurt to have that open and frank discussion, provided it is a beneficial and respectful conversation
I seriously hope for the benefit of British Air that it isnt.
The leak list ive seen so far has been right so far. Looks like a bomber mosquitto and a Gnat Mark 1.
I suppose still a chance we’ll get something else, leaks are never 100% right. But all top tier british things at this point would have to have AMRAAM. so unless that gets announced with the trailer. Its not happening this update