With the Indian T-90 being introduced this next major update it opens the gate for more Commonwealth vehicles to be added in a subtree.
countries that could be included in this subtree contain:
Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Pakistan, India and Singapore to name a few
this could potentially mean Britain could finally be competitive with vehicles like the:
Australian Abrams, Canadian Leo2A4, Singapore Leo2SG, Pakistani VT-4 and the Indian Arjun, New Zealand Bob Semple tank
this would also mean some vehicles could move trees
like the Canadian LeoC2A1, Class 3 (P), Australian Abrams.
I think this is something that should have been done before they added the indian T-90. India is no longer a member of the commonwealth and left in the 1950’s or something like that. The T-90 was not a thing then. They should have done current members of the commonwealth first just do to the fact most of the stuff that will get added if a subtree was made will be more modern so I think it just makes stuff of having the things added that were used whilst said country was in the commonwealth to begin with.
I think there should be a full subtree “Countries of the Commonwealth” Australia, Canada and New Zealand (If they have anything worth adding, the rest of the other current countries are small and honestly dont have much).
I think it would be dope honestly because we would get things like the 2A4M, 2A6M so it wouldnt just be a full copy paste of the german leopards they would have some minor changes.
I dont think the 2SG should come until later. I think all Current members of the commonwealth should be the main project and later on down the line they could add former.
The other thing with adding a subtree that includes the commonwealth countries means it would include new things aswell like the Boxer CRV, ASLAV, Coyote and anything else that might be cool.
Imported vehicles with little modifications go into their origin nations tree.
That means vehicles like the Ram, Wolf, Rhino, etc would go into the British tree. However, vehicles like the Australian Abrams and Canadian Leopard would go into the US and German trees.
I’d also add another rule for vehicles that were built for the British Commonwealth during WW2:
If the British fielded it, then it goes in the British tree.
If the British didn’t field it, it goes into the origin nations tree.
So that means something like the T18E2 would go into the British tree, but the T14 would stay in the US tree. It also means that when the T17 Staghound comes it would go into the British tree, but things like the T17E3 and Deerhound would go into the US tree. Even the T18E2 with the 37mm could go into the US tree, as the British didn’t field the prototype they only fielded the production model.
That’s not a subtree, that’s 8.
That’s like Germany getting a central Europe subtree or the US getting a LatAm subtree
You can’t just claim the best vehicles of a dozen nations, that’s not how it works. Pick one or two (and Britain already has one) nation and you get everything they operated. Otherwise there’s no point in even having trees because every tree will be whatever good vehicles a dozen nations have used.
This. I’d have preferred the British tree to be Commonwealth Realm. Then have a separate Commonwealth of Nations tree, the big 2 in that being South Africa and India supported by 40+ minor nations.
No, keep India and Pakistan out. They are not apart of the commonwealth and do not have the British monarch as their head of state. Adding Russian and Chinese tech to a Western country does not make any sense.
I do not care if it’s been confirmed. Adding India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka will upset the entire player base except for British mains. Britain will have Russian, Chinese, Israeli, American, French, and many more country’s tech, some of which are very important to the uniqueness of other trees like for example the Rafales, Su-30s (they are heavily modified but it’s still Copy/Paste), Mig-21s, Kfirs, and Mirages. You keep showing us screenshots of people responding to cherry picked statements even though that isn’t my point, my point and many other people’s point is that India should be removed as a subtree of Britain and added either as an independent tree which could definitely work as a potential Indian tree because it has less Copy/Paste than China (see “Call of Mahabharata” on the forums), or an Israeli, Russian or French subtree. Ignorance like this is what causes the community to hate this game.
I disagree, just like I disagree with the idea of a “Commonwealth tree” to many nations are used in making it up.
The major Commonwealth nations(UK, Canada, India, ZA and ANZACs) all can make their own or at least half of a tree. Heck the UK is so full it can’t even get stuff it operated, the sub-trees are even worse with having to fight for the limited space in the tree. (At worse Canada and the ANZACs are need to be combined for one tree)
If a sub-tree rework happen, the maybe I’d change my mind.
