Its also substantially higher penetrating designed to hit completely different spots.
Im aware that the post pen damage is rather lacking but the conq is not a bad tank due to this.
Same as the 88mm guns post pen is rather lacking .
I didnt just say SPAA did I , I said “auto cannons need reviewed again”
You arent reading at all just taking segments out to make it seem like I’ve said something ridiculously stupid.
Just to reinforce this statementm even in segment of my text you quoted, I did not state it was an SPAA that destroyed a 9.3 MBT frontally, I clearly stated, (even in the text you quoted)
“shredded frontally by 20mm auto cannon holders”
Ill keep that in mind next time a 2a6 dies to a 30mm dart somehow drifting through a random “gap” in the armour.
It very much is the case, dunno why you say it isn’t, there are reports for so many tanks in the game with these pixel sized gaps in armour.
You cannot read can you.
I didn’t say it does not benefit the larger cannons, I said it’s, and I quote , “un noticable” which means when a 105MM cannon round ( for example) hits the pixel and goes through, you chalk it up to the pen of the cannon.
When a 20mm on say, a Marder, or RCV etc manages to go through, say teh mantlet of an AMX30 Super, Or leopard 1A5, you notice it substantially more.
that is the first ever time I’ve seen that be said.
On top of this, as far as im aware for the gepard, its dual feed system meant someone had to be outside the tank to switch it over to the APDS rounds.
Reality doesnt write anything different, You just genuienly either cannot read or are choosing to ignore what the words that are infront of you mean.
At no point did I state that IFV’s were not designed to be able to.
Puma for a start has a 30MM specifically designed for being able to take on heavier armour.
The XM800T mounts the same 20MM for example as the Marder 1A3 an auto cannon never designed to go up against heavy armour, instead extremely light armour and infact infantry
Hence the name IFV.
On top of this, we have seen in real life a bradley bushmaster take out a T90 and exceptionally close range.
however as I stated above about the hull damage mechanic (which you conviently ignored)
The Bradley caused repetative hits which eventually broke through (apparently.) its cannon was never designed to be going toe to toe with an MBT, the fact that it can is entirely different.
EDIT: Im not gonna keep this going with the auto cannon stuff BTW, cause I do not want to derail yet another thread its becoming somewhat of a bad habit.
However, I will say one thing. How can you say to @MotorolaCRO that he hasn’t played the entire Ground TT for britain, when you aren’t even past rank 5 in the ground tree and he is ?
Bit strange to say that, on top of this the conquoror you said was bad, you do extremely well with…
