British bias

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
3

Same thing happens to the Obj 775, T10A, M and IS-4M as well as the T-55… its a very cheap way to die…

4

I’m still looking for the Russian bias and stalinium armor that many claims we have bro

12 Likes
5

I let it go if its just one of the rare gaijin’d moments bro, not after I head-on a ZA-35 and my obj 140 instantly blows up, the forehead is so weak that I suspect M22 could pen it.

1 Like
6

It’s only bias when it happens on USSR tanks, otherwise it’s funni mishap.

1 Like
7

for the cheap price of 1099 GJN coins, you can buy yourself an Object 279 and experience stalinium in 4k

1 Like
8

page-1
page-1835×1094 225 KB

No offence, but the ‘British Bias’ claim somehow made me nervous and sweating…

It feels quite bizarre…

11 Likes
9

And yet, the Fox is still artificially nerfed by Gaijin because the community doesnt like Britain having anything good.

Wouldn’t surprise me if they nerfed it again because soviet mains “felt” it had too much pen

15 Likes
10

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like
11

So true, British bias is so real. Rule brittania, the sun never sets on Britain!

4880faa2d7828b151bda86170f06ffde
4880faa2d7828b151bda86170f06ffde1024×611 1.16 MB

4 Likes
12

Classic UK victim complex.
I’ve played through the entire TT and the only bad vehicles I’ve encountered are Warriors.

Yes, Soviet mains rule the game lmao.

9 Likes
13

Tbf, autocannon vehicles seem to behave really weirdly when it comes to pixel-wide gaps in armour.

I’ve been frontally penned in my Cent Mk III by a wiesel 1a4

1 Like
14

The falcon just annihilates the turret crew of T-80s if you shoot the optics on the top

15

Can’t really talk about anything that’s lowtier but Russia definitely excels in many categories in Top Tier (AAs,Helis,ERA,CAS…etc)

16

“British Bias” “Russian bias”
autocannons just behave dumb. I’ve frontally penned heavies with Type 87 RCV, Sub II, Type 89, etc. With little armour weaknesses (such as optics), comes weird interactions w/ autocannons.

3 Likes
17

Stalinium armor was in 2013-2022 before Nato armor overrun Soviet armor.

18

Russian ERA still overperform NATO ERA so i don’t know what you’re talking about.

5 Likes
19

-Gets pinged in the cupola by a high power 30mm APDS in a place with 40mm of armour

-wonders why he took damage

get real

image
image1552×623 121 KB

image
image1550×696 260 KB

Also must thank you for making me look into how to deal with a 140. Its actually really simple to do, those cupolas have literally no armour

1 Like
20

People refuse to realise the Rarden gun is as powerful as a GAU-8 but firing APDS.

top speed and turret are gimped to sop people crying too hard while they use XM800T and 2s38

4 Likes
21

When people keep on talking about that thing, I started to believe it exists bro, because trust and social bonding are fundamental to human relationships bro, but all these years I was expecting it to have that Stalinium or bias but almost always end up in disappointment.

Maybe I shouldn’t trust people anymore man I am done being betrayed!

Spoiler

22

The RARDEN definitely isn’t as powerful as GAU-8, but it has the advantage in some scenarios. Calling it outright “as powerful” is merely a conjecture. I do love the fox though, lol

RARDEN Autocannon

  • Caliber: 30mm
  • Rate of Fire: 90 rounds per minute (manually loaded magazine)
  • Feed System: Three-round clips (manual loading)
  • Primary Use: Mounted on armored vehicles like the FV510 Warrior and Scimitar reconnaissance vehicles
  • Advantages: High muzzle velocity, effective against lightly armored targets, simple and reliable design
  • Limitations: Low rate of fire due to manual loading, limited ammunition capacity

GAU-8 Avenger

  • Caliber: 30mm
  • Rate of Fire: Up to 3,900 rounds per minute
  • Feed System: Linkless feed system with a massive ammunition drum
  • Primary Use: Mounted on the A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft for close air support
  • Advantages: Extreme rate of fire, devastating firepower against armored targets, highly effective in air-to-ground combat
  • Limitations: Heavy and complex system, requires hydraulic power to operate

Comparison

  • The RARDEN is designed for ground combat, primarily engaging enemy vehicles and infantry with precision.
  • The GAU-8 Avenger, on the other hand, is an aircraft-mounted weapon, optimized for high-speed strafing runs against armored targets.
  • The GAU-8 Avenger has a significantly higher rate of fire, making it far more destructive in short bursts.
  • The RARDEN is simpler and more reliable for ground vehicles but lacks the sheer firepower of the GAU-8 Avenger.
2 Likes