Yeah but NORDEFCO go Brrrrr
Only non nordic subtree that could go to sweden is Latvia due to their military arms ties and history
Estonia too but given they primarily train with the UK id rather them go there
to be honest, a Nordic line would be quite interesting, united with Sweden, Austria and Swiss should also be added to Germany, Swiss already has its air part
We are just missing Denmark but quite a few German players want us just for the F16’s we have. Tbf it would be weird to be a German subtree especially if they had our spitfires and vehicles that were used against them but snails gotta snail.
Germany doesn’t need this, Austria and Switzerland fit perfectly into Germany
Austria air is literally just sweden air lol, they used almost every single swedish jet, and given sweden currently is the worst air tree that would be the final nail in the coffin lol, left with 2 unique jets as their only thing lol
We still have the land part, it’s true that many things would be the same, but it could well strengthen the lineups, I believe that for Europe there are many unique vehicles for many nations, but at the same time the majority use vehicles from other European countries or american vehicles, and then we are in a kind of paradox.
I have most of Germany and i think Austria air wouldn’t really add to anything, would make gaijin less money as just another reason to stop playing sweden air. Swiss ground and Austrian ground should fully go to Germany imo, got some additions im waiting on like the Panzer 68.
Additionally sweden will still have a lot of gaps even with Denmark and Norway
i agree with you
wasnt expecting to see one of my old tanks on here… 90% sure i took the picture of the canadian Leo 2 a4 with the dozer blade. lol
also, they Devs should stop being stubborn assholes and just make a Commonwealth tech tree with all current and former nations vehicles in the tree. it would be a massive tree. and theres zero arguments against it because they keep adding everything to everything.
Its such a ragebait post lol
Anyways, would rather actually have the Arjun over the Leopard 2 and its not because “hur durr copy paste” but because I do actually think having the Arjun would be fun. Would be like a more mature TTD.
Wont matter if its not meta, its one of the few attempts to really mix east and west together since the collapse of China’s Leopard something tank.
im too looking forward to penetration cum blasting my enemies
2 Likes
Ok,
So, issues I didn’t see before, with the Canadian.
2A4M. Wrong pic, would be a 2A4 with ticker floor armour. “M CAN” is where the added-on amour is, and what the pic is of.
This suggests Canada used the 2A6, which is wrong. I asked around(aka asked the Canadian server), and we only used the 2A6M/M CAN(yes, there is a difference). With the M CAN having Barracuda kit and C6 over MG3 of the base 2A6M.
Well, I’ll give the Cents a pass as even we Canadian’s can’t figure out what ones we used. Well, Mk 3,5,11 are locked in stuff suggests we also used Mk 5/2 and Mk 6(I think I’ve seen other marks but can’t recall them).
Tho the Leo 1s being glanced over is odd as it 4 max. C1, C1(Mexas), C2, C2(Mexas). (The C2A1 is a FAL, not a tank; it’s in the growing pile of misinformation Gaijin has spread.) But then again, this is a hate post.
Yet it was the one I was looking forward to, as the day we get a Canadian Leo 2 in the UK, would be amazing (unless we get a Canadian/CANZ tree first). allowing me to play Germany again, among other things(like my willing to learn top teir)
I can already imagine the Arjun phonk edit destroying Chinese Type 99s lol
That actualy we could have likely told you out of our order sharts for the leos.
The M standibg for the mineplate is obvious and noted from i think the dutch sales it was
The A6Ms that gernmany loaned us did have MG3s. you can see them in pictures of canadian leopards. but eventually canada did mount the C6 on the A4M and the A6M
the 2A4m picture is correct.
Yes, it is correct if it was titled a picture of the 2A4M CAN.
Here is a picture of a 2A4M
M stands for mine protection, not add-on armour, so just a thicker floor. If you want the add-on amour Canada uses, you need an “M CAN”.
Hence why I split it into 2A6M and 2A6M CAN.
Yea, we usuallu never say the can part when talking about our tanks. And i know what is pictured, ive probably operated the turret of the one pictured.
China gets the M1A2T from Taiwan, and the Oplot that was only trialed by Pakistan. With Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia, Japan bas the potential for a lineup with the Olot-T, VT-4, PT-91M, and Leopard 2RI. France and Italy get Leopards via their sub trees, Sweden gets a T-80U they trialed, Israel will likely end up with T-80Us and Leopard 2s from Cyprus and Greece.
Yet when the prospect of Canadian Leopards or Aussie Abrams in the British tree comes up, everyone throws a fit. Britian will probably end up stuck with off meta Challengers, and Arjuns that will be even worse.
2 Likes