Must have been, as all of the 1920 series designs were made after it had been decided that all subsequent ships were to have the shell room above the magazines.
This is an early version that was rejected. G3 that was ordered carried 16" guns and also had improvements in armor
When I play naval, it’s almost exclusively EC so good news, Rodney will be fixed by the time I research and buy it
Honestly unacceptable doesn’t describe it well enough, though i wont use other words
3 Likes
What’s with the impossibly fast torpedoes still being shown? They show two different speeds depending on if you are in a game or not as well.
Pt boat getting overtook and then some by a torpedo
1 Like
Arkhangelesk turret rotation error
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/aoyLoUxl7P0X
9 Likes
Please stop spamming useless reports like this.
2 Likes
A single report counts as spam these days? Why hasn’t Alvis or MiG been banned yet?
4 Likes
The N3 but that is a full paper ship but the guns and armor are at minimum equal but with a much lower top speed
It is an accurate error report tho. A British boat with the wrong name and flags in the wrong tree
1 Like
It’s the arcade stats
1 Like
If a report is very much of a non-serious nature and does not conform to the basic rules of the report site, then yes it is spam as its taking staffs time to have to review and close it. Taking them away from processing other valid reports.
If someone is found to be making reports for trolling / sarcastic purposes, then they will face a ban on the CBR. This was simply a warning.
1 Like
1 Like
You see, the thing is that he said:
This is a singular report that has been posted once. If he had said “please do not make spam reports” then that would be the end of story. However this report is 100% factual and contained 2 secondary sources. While I understand Gaijin doesn’t model reliability issues I do think that because this issue was so severe they had to scrap Royal Sovereign because of it.
The request was to stop spamming. This was a spam report and thus a clear warning to not do that was issued.
This report contained one attached source:
That was not valid or conclusive.
There is no conclusive evidence of this within the report or that this issue was a lifelong issue of the ship throughout its entire Soviet service and the ship never once rotated its guns. The source in the report claims it was returned in that condition and even that is not fully clear by this one extract.
if individuals continue to knowingly misuse the bug report site, then this warning will not continue to be a warning, but will become a ban. Wasting staffs time with non serious / trolling reports is not justifiable.
This will not be discussed further here. If you have an issue or dispute with the way a report was handled, then it should be raised in PM. The warning was for the OP of the report.
2 Likes
slightly un related are there plans to duplicate the ship over to the british tree or will the R class stay russian for a while
3 Likes
Its possible a Revenge class will appear in the future for the British tree. But as with the existing rule, we wont have two ships of the same name sake (even in different periods) in different trees. So it cannot simply be Royal Sovereign.
2 Likes
HMS Royal Oak next update (Trust)
1 Like