Okay so Wargaming also announced Arkhangelsk
And uses wrong turret modelling of what War Thunder used. I’m surprised that both game still share their modelling.
1 Like
What’s wrong with it ?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DyNUCfrblBaS
Somebody just found out that Gajin reuses 3D assets (which is completely fair for a game of this size)
QE and R class battleship’s turret is not fully rounded on front, but isosceles trapezoid front with rounded corners. Ingame HMS Barham is with correct modelling, but Warspite and Arkhangelsk uses wrong modelling, which is basically re-using of Renown’s one.
Ahh I see,
She also uses Mk 1/N mounts in game which none of the R class ever received
1 Like
dont worry, they’ll be 7.0
You can partially relax. That list is confirmed fake.
Though doesnt mean we wont see new meta ships next major update
1 Like
well this is what some people are thinking from the QnA they put out
5 Likes
Yeah, its possible. Vast could also be Vanguard. (Fast Vanguard = Vast)
um but i dont really want another 15inch BB give me a late war kgv
Yeah… as do I.
well if they were really kind they would give us a late war design for Lion class battleship
This is Britain and Gaijin we are talking about. We just have to hope we get anything built after 1919 to compete with these new top tier ships
it is truly a case of Look What They Need to Mimic a Fraction of Our Power
Found a article about the baden trials
I would honestly prefer Vittorio Veneto over Vanguard right now simply for Italy. I heavily doubt they model the de-capping system and the reload is worse than Rodney’s closer to Colorado’s. Penetration is phenomenal with the caveat of some of the worst dispersion known to man (seriously like genuinely the dispersion is
poor enough that at even War Thunder ranges shells may not hit in the same postal code) also filler sucks too.
It would be like a better Colorado really.
Pretty balanced overall I think. That’s assuming there is no decapping system…
1 Like
De-capping system will be not work on war thunder’s range anyways. 70 mm is even too thin for working in close range.
Besides, what will decide Littorio class’ armor is how Gaijin will interpret presence of ‘concerete’ used for gap between armor. We have concrete armor in war thunder and it’s quite effective.
The concrete thing would benefit the KGVs and Vanguard also. But for those ships I’m not sure if they’d ignore it as it’s a layer behind other armour.
I think Littorio would still be valid as it’s got that poor reload to balance it out