I do see the fuel tank in my future potentially. Though also having some bombs is also nice in SB.
Yeah, either way id call HMD a pretty major capability difference for the current meta at top tier ARB
Depends.
İf Gripen C recieves better Rwr and Radar it will be better package overall.
Tbh if they add proper Rwr to Gripen A many Swedish mains (including me) will accept this current situation i believe.
good old budget cuts
something like that
1 Like
This is a odd choice as the PS/05A mk3 couldn’t control them iirc
Then I dont see why its not on the Dev Server yet. When the differences are so small.
Yea the RWR right now is a joke. When HMD stays the only major difference, them im too happy. Finally Gripen. Cant wait to fly it in the live server
I mean it’s a Harrier
Yeah but the FRS versions were specifically Fleet air defense as a primary role
You mean G-pull? All variants after 120B pulled less because of their clipped control surfaces.
B ~35G
C+ ~28G
1 Like
AIM120 pulls 50G as it utilises bank to turn.
İt pulls 50G with dual plane according to some information.
Well that is interesting, I guess its just placeholder until AMRAAM.
Yes and it utilises bank to turn so it can use dual plane at all times
which afaik isnt modeled in game
even if it is, the value you’d see in game would still be 35 and 28 and not 50…
1 Like
It’s not modelled but if it was it would be 50. Phoenix should be bank to turn currently not modelled as so but it was said on forums if it was it would get its true G values
remember that gajiin shows the single plane value and uses those for calculations.
in other words, every other missile would get massively buffed as well and the amraam wouldn’t be special in that regard
oh cool they’re lying about what the 39C is. what a surprise
1 Like