Yeah, those would be neat but by No shot would they be good. We’ve already been snubbed the only domestic thing for this time period. under the thinly veiled reasoning of “Tech demonstrator” which translates better to “double standard” in gaijin speak.
I am disappointed that this is the route taken by the devs. but it is what it is. and honestly it looks like it will at the very least be a pretty solid platform. So I suppose there’s that!
Something like the Cheetah would probably be 11.3 and so like the current 11.3s, would probably only ever see 12s and 12.3s. As unique as they might be, they would be unplayable.
Hawk would be interesting and playable as it wouldnt see top tier.
Im fine with Gripen. Shame they couldnt give Britain anything unique (there were options from the UK) but as a practice delta wing for Typhoon, its fine
One positive of how cracked the Gripen and M4K are in-game is some hope for the Eurofighter to get its true flight performance. More thrust than either, almost equal immediate AoA to the Gripen and better sustained, should be an exceptional hybrid between the two, but on a massive Trenbolone cycle.
I know, but i’d expect all equivalent FM’s to be tuned down too. Also its worth noting that for US aircraft, the F-16BLK 10 is the peak outside of the Raptor and even thats debatable.
For Russia there is the option of the Su-30’s which will be even more maneuverable but with more speed bleed and heavier FM’s, we are seeing the peak and at least by paper metrics, the EF should beat several of these aircraft.
I don’t think they will tbh. Ammo count, loadouts and radar sure but FM at least for the Gripen seems pretty much final with maybe small tweaks needed to Virtual Instructor.
Yea i can see how they giving Gripen C to Uk, a country that has nothing to do with it while they are giving Gripen A to main producer and user aka Sweden.