It makes sense when they do things like this. Not always. But in this context, if they’re gonna remove something they should be doing it with all aircraft of a similar feat. Besides that, it’s why no one believes them at all anymore.
Cause Gaijin sets rules ->Incompleted=allowed in the game with its loadouts. But does an Xbox 720 and 60-degree Florida man banana split also known as->removing something from the loadouts? Aka it’s double standards to set rules but not follow your own sets you set up. It’s like going to McDonalds and ordering a Big Mac but instead of the worker giving you what you ordered, gives you a Happy Meal instead.
Production. [Kurnass 2000/2S38]
Prototype.
Different rule sets.
Then among prototypes: Combat ready. [F-20A/Leopard 2K]
Incomplete. [Ho-229]
There are no double standards. Kurnass 2000 is a production vehicle that was at least purchased once.
Even 2S38 has a client, despite their limited production run thus far.
If I recall correctly from somewhere, the Israelis outright stripped the Kurnass 2000 of its ability to carry and fire the Sparrow, due to them essentially filling a pure bomb-truck role.
historical standards are applied to planes that arent fully fictional, things like the Yak-141 exist how it is ingame because it didnt mount any weapons irl so they have to make pure assumtions. something like the Kurnass 2000 was a fully serviced plane with absolutely zero ability to use radar missiles.
Are you sure about that?
The “hystorical standard” Is respected only when Is conveniente to gaijin
The italian F-16 Never used the Sparrow while using the AIM-120 and yet in the game can’t use what hystorically had while using something he can’t use IRL
Same for the 104TAF as the Turkish army Never bought the 104S with the ability to use the Sparrows (By removing the internal gun)
AN/APG-76 is used in F-4E Kurnass 2000 (Israel) and has been tested in a pod configuration with the F-16 and S-3 Viking Gray Wolf Project. AN/APG-76 incorporates capability of AN/APQ-173 such as being compatible with AGM-88 and AIM-120, and it can also be configured as a side-looking radar. The side-looking version of AN/APG-76 played a very important role in the development of AN/APY-3 radar for Northrop Grumman E-8 Joint STARS in providing the foundation of know-hows for the development of the more advanced AN/APY-3.
That means that Kurnass 2000 should have AIM-120 and AGM-88 in such way?
Well i also went on official iaf simulator (was very cool) and in the waiting room there was info about planes one of them was the kurnass 2000 and it said it can took sparrows but i dont have a proof of that :(
This has been said more than enough times; the K2K can’t use Sparrows. Yes it can carry them, but cannot guide them, the radar makes it impossible, as it had no wave filters. Unless you want the Sparrow to be added for it just for it to be launched and go towards nothing and then just explode, it won’t change anything.
None of the images even show it having Sparrows, which makes some site say it even less trusted.
