Brimstones... we have a problem

should this be implemented

  • yes
  • maybe
  • no
0 voters

As many people argue over the fact that brimstones will be too OP if mmV is added, many other munitions are constantly added… lets talk about that

Schindibee: “It was explained explicitly when the Brimstone was added to WT that the functionality you mention was not added because of balance reason. So not really a bug, but a decision about that guidance mechanic.”

what? the millimetric wave function, fair enough but why can’t we get a compromise like many other munitions like the MITL weapons or the Fiber Optic weapons

lets see some reasons why the fact that both the devs and community saying how there would just be a spam of brimstones is being hypocritical (no offence dont ban me <3)

№1 The GBU-59 "stormbreaker… 20x

GBU-59 "stormbreaker

The F15E (and the new F-15EX and IA) is capable of bringing 20x of these stormbreakers, The community constantly argue that:

Images

image

Support claim: u/Careless_Scarcity_73

I see no reason, at the current moment, to not give the Brimstones their fire and forget ability

counter claim: u/powerpuffpepper & u/peaxto

“I see no reason why we shouldn’t have 18 fire and forget missiles on one of the best top tier platforms in the game”
Reworded it for you.

“I see no reason why we shouldn’t have 18 fire and forget missiles that are immune to smoke and can independently target different enemies without ever having seen them on one of the best top tier platforms in the game”

sources

however yet there are 8 vehicles that can hold these stormbreakers, 7 of which only hold 8… much like the Eurofighter typhoon with SPICE-250’s however if something aka The F-15E can hold 20 glide IR bombs at once that have a much higher chance of killing a target than a Brimstone, why can’t the brimstone get its Fire and Forget feature… even if its not mmV just TV guidance or IR to be generous… (not happening knowing Gaijin)

Details


even then 10 vehicles get access to the Brimstone with the Eurofighter typhoon getting the most (18), so Great Britain wouldn’t get the largest straw when this would be implemented, you know what, this is starting to get boring arguing with the storm breakers…

№2 fire and forget missiles, on helicopters

Helicopters

only 5 helicopters get the AGM-179 IR “Hellfire” and only 1 gets the LMUR “Izdeliye 305”

but only does china gets 2 helicopters that have fire and forget AGM’s, the AH-64E, with hellfire’s, and the
Z-10ME, with the CM-502KG and the Blue Arrow 11… so not only does China get 2 separate helicopters with 16x F&F munitions, one of the helicopters gets 2 different missiles, yes one of them has a limit of 8 however I think my point is proven

munitions

image
image
image

a very large point is that 18x Brimstones are too OP, there would just be spam, guess what, helicopters can do the exact same thing and also be very hard to hit with ARH missiles, yes they are very vulnerable to SACLOS SPAA like the FlaRakRad, Pantsir S-1/SM-SV, ADATS, FK-2000, but they can just take cover behind a cliff or hill, planes can do the same, just not as easily, is my point starting to be proven… probably not but that’s called denial

OH AND UPDATE MITL IS ADDED SO YAY ONLY AWARE AA PLAYERS CAN COUNTER IT BROOOOOOO

№2.5 Jets are denied, helicopters are blessed*

more info

can a helicopter hover… no kidding sherlock, can a plane hover… yes but bad with most munitions, ok so what am i on about, im on that helicopters can ripple 18x missiles and dive behind cover and rearm while jets have a constant problem of:

  • Fox-3 inbound
  • Constantly moving at low altitude (if not low altitude then high and being careful for SPAA)
  • airfield is all the way over there

helicopters on the other hand:

  • aware SPAA with SACLOS
  • incoming brimstone
  • incoming jet to do a fly-by and vaporise

yes there are not exactly any defences for these unless DIRCM works against laser idk… don’t ask me

in short helicopters are more capable in CAS on paper, and yet they are given 16x f&f missiles (or 8 very good missiles…) and only one nation has a very good counter

I’m not saying russian bias HOWEVER, britain gets the ADATS (M113), no gun, just 8 decent missiles, then we get the sky sabre, good missiles however a grind in a half to get… oh did i mention the only random SPAA britain gets is the ADATS, russia gets the pantsir S-1… ARE YOU SERIOUS not only that but lets look at all nations as this is a discussion

USA: ADATS or XM975
Germany: FlaRakRad or FlaRakPz 1
UK: ADATS
Japan: Type 81 (C)
china: HQ-17 (Tor M-1)
France: ITo 90M
Italy: OTOMATIC
sweden: ITo 90M
Isreal: Machbet

Russia… 2S6 tunguska, Pantsir S1, Tor M-1

brotha

ok then I think we may have shown some details to why Great Britain has been shafted in war thunder, now lets look at some details I have found

Variants Of the Brimstone
before I continue obviously many comments are going to arouse of how modern some of these variants are so just remember how the T-90M and the SEP V3 and Ajax are approximately 2020’s

The Brimstone (2005)
almost the same as what we have in-game, IRL however solely relying on mmV seeker, range on aircraft of 12-20 km

image

image

Dual-mode Brimstone (DMS) (2008)
The brimstone variant that was based on for the SAL (semi-active laser) mode that was added in-game, this was done in 2008 during the Afghanistan war as civilian and friendly forces were in proximity to each other requiring no mmV mistakes

Brimstone 2 (2016)
introduced an upgraded modular airframe, and enhanced guidance software, newer IM motor, improved seeker and a better range of over 200% with a max range of 40-60+ km

Brimstone 3 (2019)
main upgrade was the capability for Surface-to-surface launch capabilities with the ability to be mounted on the Supacat HMT600 Wolfram, Ajax and boxer variants

images

image


maritime Brimstone “Sea Spear” (2013)
a navalized version of the brimstone designed to destroy swarms of fast inshore attack craft (FIAC) with a 16kg payload capacity

video & image

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmYqq3qehDE

SPEAR 3 (2026?)
A developmental, clean-sheet cruise missile derivative built heavily on Brimstone technology. It incorporates a turbojet engine, swarm AI logic, and a vastly extended air-launched standoff range of up to 130 km

images

image
image

a conclusion
now then after all that there are obviously going to be people saying how Brimstones are still to OP, heck you may never even read this because 90% of my posts get removed instantly but that doesn’t matter, the point stands that the developers are ignoring us UK mains and giving other countries the best of the best, well then I guess there are some options we have

№1: The Sea Spears can use a sea radar on the typhoons or tornado

№2: a compromise of TV guidance is given

№2.5: even if the devs say no to that then a perfect GNSS capability should be balanced

№2.75: even if that’s not added because spamming the enemy spawn in GRB, then the feature is disabled in certain game modes like the upcoming cluster bombs

№3: the AESA variant of the typhoon gets the modern brimstones but not things like the FGR.4 and tornado’s idk don’t blame me i.e the FGR.4 can get the Sea spear and the DMS brimstone while the AESA gets the SPEAR 3 and brimstone 2 & 3 (other vehicles like the JAS-39E idk same as the AESA ig)

P.S @Miraz05 thanks for reminding me
the LOAL GCS-1 bomb is being added and a point Gaijin made was the team killing possibilities with LOAL… make that what you will

and now we have a new update… THERE ARE 18x GCS-1 LOAL guided bombs now… again proving the point of gaijin saying how

autonomous lock on after launch brimstones would lead to friendly fire increasing… not adding

so developers whats happening then, next major after eagle’s shadow?
(which the UK is being completely overshadowed this update)

@BVV_d

so Update, i guess the community is so broken between this discussion that it would just cause even more arguments, as the thread can show, why is this, i don’t know, all im wishing and many of us is something that gives great britain something that has an edge to rival countries

please devs… even just air game-modes

7 Likes

Its probably our fault. If Germany wouldn’t have Brims ingame, GB would get mmW most likely added.

Great post.
But I would love to get spear GNSS first and then brimstones.

Eurofighter cas buff is not that needed anyway.

With the upcoming self locking GCS bombs, I don’t see anymore reasons to hold back the mmW guidance for the Brimstones

14 Likes

in all honesty with how fast gaijin is adding more modern tanks and planes, and the BR decompression (hopefully more in the future) I don’t see why this couldn’t be added. it doesn’t make sense not to, as it is a loss of fire and forget weaponry for any future weaponry additions despite missiles like the maverick existing at lower BRs. many nations have extremely powerful counters against both the munition itself by intercept and the launch aircraft as well, the chance to fire a munition gets slimmer every time a new AA is added (which is GOOD, but there is an inherent need for the balance to go both ways, like MITL and high capacity of FNF weapons that don’t need LOS guidance like laser)

Another Brimstone topic and no @Morvran here yet?

1 Like

Brimstone auto lock should just be the same as current TV/IR missiles (0.5 degree fov where it auto-locks anything that goes inside of it) with the only difference being that it can be fired from behind cover

Similar to MITL but with a worse retargeting capability

2 Likes

Been at work all day, give me a minute, just got in 😜

2 Likes

The situation with Brimstones is just getting stupid now.

“No we wont add LOAL, its too OP”

Adds MITL that gives LOAL, let alone the new true LOAL bombs coming next major

“no we wont add FnF Brimstones, they would be too powerful with no counter”

Said in the same update as the Su-34 with no counter to the already OP KH-38MT

“no we wont added FnF brimstones because they would just cause Tks”

This is just total nonsense, only causes TKs if you fire them at a teammate.

Mode 2 Brimstones should have been added from the get go, would still have been weaker than KH-38MTs. Now, with the ability to restrict weapons to a gamemode (as per CBUs) We could have mode 2 in Ground but mode 3 in Air. Its stupid to keep limiting aircraft just because of tanks.

and if all that falls on deaf ears…

Why the hell have we not had SAL Brimstone 2s for vastly superior SAL weapons and GNSS or GNSS+SAL Spear-3s for a spammable stand-off weapon. Artificially nerfing the Brimstones is one thing, Artificially limiting them to also being the earliest, weakest version too is just stupid. Has been since the Tonka GR4 was added. even more so now we have E-Scan Typhoons

18 Likes

Best example of a fictional Limit amount wise is the Tornado IDS SLE, for some reason it still does not got the Brimstones on its Wings

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/InURZM1ZKY0A

(Same story with the HOSBO amount on the SLE btw, but devs wont accept the facts so no way to report it…YET)

5 Likes

wait are people actually agreeing with me on this? lol

1 Like

We’ve been arguing for proper Brimstones Since the Tornado GR4 was added 2 years ago

6 Likes

Also not sure who else notices but the IOG function doesn’t even work properly meaning you have to hold laser designation the whole way. If you hold laser 90% of the way you can see the missing jerk hard to a point as if you only had the laser on at launch. It doesn’t seem to update at all. These are basically just SAL hellfires but on a jet which is a terrible combo because the missiles are so slow.

2 Likes

IOG is just badly coded on everything.

7 Likes

we need improved brimstones especially since Britain is constantly getting left behind in that aspect, i would also love to see brimstone on the british apache mk2 and the wildcat as in theory they can carry it and the apache has been seen test firing it

2 Likes

This is the bit that irks me. Yeah, it is an anti ship system, but it’s explicitly added for NE. So the functionality is there, primarily for an environment that targets as so dispersed FF is not a concern. We should have seen MMW LOAL version announced for NE coupled with a LOBL version for ground.

Don’t slander poor su 34, thing is in not a good state. 38MT presents the same problems from a frogfoot, su 30, or su34, and is arguably better to use on the frogfoot (lil’er, easier to deploy weapons from low alt, doesn’t disintegrate at the thought of evasion). I wish hellduck was worthwhile :(

Even if 38 didn’t present the same issues for the target in evading it (yes, under ideal circumstances it is possible to defeat, but 99.999% of the time won’t be ideal circumstances), the closure rate + heavier warhead that will actually kill the thing it hits make it the significantly better choice even were LOBL Brimstones modeled. Especially in their current state.

2 Likes

Im sorry ,but when it was added, when the best and ONLY SPAA that might have been able to counter even an Su-25SM3 was the Pantsir S1… Adding the Su-34 was just stupid. Especially with the giant song and dance they did with claiming the Brimstone would be too OP because SPAA couldnt counter it.

It was added a year too early imo. If KH-38MTs should have been added at all.

2 Likes

Su 34 was potent when it was added, but I still would argue that su 25 was still the better and more reliable platform for hitting stuff. Primarily just because approach paths were shoddy. However, I am biased and my figures for the frogfoot are probably slightly inflated.

This bit was rubbish. I got silenced for a not insignificant period arguing the case that 38 demonstrated the same balancing deficiencies.

Would have been cool if we got a su 34 without them + su 34m a year after. Might have left base su 34 at a semi playable BR.

2 Likes

Yeah, god forbid the soviets were held to the same standard as everyone else. Genuinely surprised we’ve not seen the ARH version of the KH-38 yet

3 Likes

Would be surprised if we don’t see Drel and associated mmw bomblets the coming update. Unless they just keep them locked to the ir section of the seeker.

1 Like