Cant wait to see how Gaijin fixes this
Its gonna be a gamble between Gaijin fixing the launcher thing totally in one position or making us need to move it seperately similar to the Marders missile launcher if we want it to elevate or depress i guess
Should I even grind the thing instead of the 2 pumas if its in this state showing Gaijin really didnt think much about it. Although idk if the pumas are really worth it either.
I assume the Boxer MGS will really stay my light tank till i got the last german top tier tank at this point
i doubt they still remember that report xd
Boxer sWaTrgInf | Missing Basic Green Camoflauge
Thats a fair report, this is the first modern german Vehicle that has no Green Camo.
1 Like
@royal_RxpTor Protection Bulkhead doesn’t work by the way if you haven’t seen for yourself.
Boxer sWaTrgInf - Protected Ammunition Compartment Not Working
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/234chfOzLJBh
I should have posted this here now that I think about it
So apparently the HWC is called the HWC for a reason. The new MSSA mounted on the SEOSS can mount a FIM92 pod for anti-air defense, or an additional 2 Spike LR-2s/Enforcers.
Additional options are:
12.7 mm → Exists in game (Can mount extra missile pods, A2A or Anti-Tank)
MK24 Striker / Heckler & Koch Granatmaschinengewehr (GMG) → Ammunition is also Public
MG6 Minigun → Listed on Rheinmetall’s website. PDF is here.
It also says LANCE integration on the PDF for the RCWS 320C-UAS.
FIM92 Air-to-Air Missile
Javelin Missile as well.
Like, actually looking at it now. Both RCWS and Main gun should have IRST tracking. RCWS320C-UAS shows they can even put a small AESA radar for drone tracking. There is endless mission capabilities…
1 Like
It’s like PUMA days all over again.
And why You pinged me?
Anyone else dying to MG fire to the turrent?
Ah yes, it kills the crew even though the Bulkhead isnt breached, though knowing how other vehicles are behaving rn (Like the Begleit missing its option of HE-VT or the BMPT literally losing 1 Gun´s worth of ammo) im not even suprised by that
Thats pretty cool but i doubt we will see any of those systems put on the sWaTrgInf anytime soon (also they gotta rename the Enforcer to the german term named “Leichtes Wirkmittel 1800+” or LWM 1800+)
enforcer rn its not a good missile whatsoever to replace the spike, im hoping for the enforcer X to finally be something of use but we dont have anything about enforcer X yet
Yeah, I’m more excited for the MG6 with an AESA radar for drone defense. It would go super well with infantry.
Also its a standalone on the RCWS. You could still retain Spikes.
Alright, here are a few more reports. Hopefully they are not ignored.
Boxer sWaTrgInf - Missing Main Sensor Slaved Armament Options → Labels not applied
Boxer sWaTrgInf - MSSA Missing IRST Tracking for RCWS → Labels not applied
Boxer sWaTrgInf - Lance II ammunition stow is larger than KF41 → Labels not applied
Boxer sWaTrgInf - SEOSS Sensor FOV Incorrect → Not A bug.
⤷Boxer sWaTrgInf - SEOSS Sensor Incorrect Zoom & FOV → Not A bug.
Resubmitted with Data; Took me awhile to find specific parameters for both thermal and day vision cameras. 1.0x - 7.6x magnification after calculations. I included the relevant links to AIM and SEOSS500’s matching day vision camera if you want to look at it yourselves in the issue.
Data
Thermal imaging camera
Spectral band 3µm–5µm
Pixel Pitch 10μm
Resolution 1024 x 768
FoV horizontal/vertical
WFoV: 16.7° x 12.5° - 1.0x
MFoV1: 8.9° x 6.7° - 1.9x
MFoV2: 4.4° x 3.3° - 3.8x
NFoV: 2.2° x 1.7° - 7.6x
Day vision camera
Spectral band 350–1,100nm
Pixel Pitch 3.45μm
Resolution 2464 x 2056
FoV horizontal/vertical
WFoV: 16.7° x 12.5° - 1.0x
MFoV1: 8.9° x 6.6° - 1.9x
MFoV2: 4.4° x 3.3° - 3.8x
NFoV: 2.2° x 1.7° - 7.6x
An outdated source of the prototype SEOSS2 sensor is pushed instead of the physical evidence that MSSA doesn’t use the SEOSS2 sensor, what a wonderful society we live in.
I did bug report the sight stats in the Dev which they did implement, but i can definitely say that the MSSA Options will be either labeled a Not a Bug or Not Enough Info as we never really seen the vehicle have it in the first place but lets see what they will respond with, though ngl i do love the MG6 option
In case it interest someone, full list of Vehicles with a 14999m LRF:
HSTV(L), M10 Booker, RDF/LT, 2S38, ZA-35, Typ 24 ICV(P), Typ 25 RCV(P), CM34, EBRC Jaguar
Typ 24 ICV (P)
N/A
CM34
N/A
Puma/Puma VJTF:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FmMjJFHckTne
sWaTrgInf:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/in0MWa6iy8aR
1 Like