What is the win rate of the USA and Russia in the top tier?
U.S has low win rates mostly because of gaijin. Giving the U.S a premiun every updated is not alright.
Russian bias is over used tho.
The Abrams can use some buffs not nerfs tho.
Anyways. This is an F-15EX thread
1 Like
I’m a Chinese main
Spot on
See China and Japan. No F-2, J-10C etc
3 Likes
At least China has the Temufighter I left Japan out because it isn’t going to get anything and Gaijin has at least been somewhat kind to give it the best 1st Gen F16 in-game that didn’t even exsit and to gave them one of the best SPAAMS in the game
Ah yes, the stupid slandering of the several unique chinese vehicles that exsist that look nothing like other vehicles.
As for the J-10A, you cannot compare it to the eurofighter. Eurofighter is equivalent to J-10B, and I honestly think (and this is gonna be controversial) that the eurofighter being after the J-10A is understandable, considering China has not been given anything unique for a very long time.
Mitsubishi F-2. As much as I like dunking on japan, japan deserves the F-2.
I honestly think the best way to know there is no bias is to play a bit of each tech tree at times. I do main China however I also play US, Germany, Russia, UK and the other TTs(obviously, i have not gotten very far, but I have played them quite a lot). Then you know the snail makes it so all TTs get equal suffering.
Every group of mains WILL inherently be biased to victimize themselves. I hear tonnes of other Chinese mains claim US and Russian Bias, i hear russian mains claim US bias, and US and german mains claim russian bias.
I understand where you are coming from, I also used to claim russian and german bias, but after playing russia and germany occasionally for a while I understand that Bias does not exsist.
1 Like
I call the J10 series the Temufighter
100% agree on that. It can come now but my point is that dening Russian bias is a dumb argument and can be proven wrong pretty easily. That is without mentioning the bad legal things that Gaijin have done
There is a bit of bias for Germany but most of it is dealing with coping German mains
It definitly does. Britain for example has so many vehicles that can be added but instead there are C&P vehicles and subtrees that don’t need to be there but in-game are needed to do many lacking things
1 Like
You aren’t convincing me any further using this, just makes me think you are some 12 year old
Have you played Russia? If you have not played russia or russian tanks in other TTs you have NO right to complain about russian bias. I used to also be a beliver in russian bias due to the IS-2, but when I unlocked the IS-2 i realized it is not some biased vehicle, just simply one with good stats(e.g. the Spitfire)
If you are only going to use britain as an argument, you ain’t going anywhere; Every main will victimize themselves. Just check out Japanese, Russian, American, Chinese or any other main. Reason why “Russian bias” is discussed so much is simply because there are much more US and German mains
There are so many vehicles that can be added for all tech trees
If you are going to use vehicles as an argument, just see China. We have the unfortunate title of “C&P” because we had little unique vehicles in game, which in fact there are many chinese vehicles that can be added.
3 Likes
Can you guys please take this off-topic conversation to DMs? None of this is relevant to the F-15EX suggestion.
7 Likes
I noticed a mistake in the suggestion. The powerplant would be the F110-GE-129 or the first batches with the F100-PW-229.
The F110-GE-129 would be far more accurate tho
2 Likes
I agree, and I corrected it to the F110-GE-129 now. I shall start to overhaul my history and specs sections later by this evening.
1 Like
I’ve completely retouched the F-15EX Eagle II suggestion post. I got rid of old and junk articles and replaced them with current, reliable materials. I’ve organized them neatly in the sources section.
The suggestion is now updated with improvements and accurate information as of now. If I have missed anything or forgotten to add something, then feel free to ping me here on this thread.
4 Likes
Here’s a YouTube video of F-15 EX Eagle II performing an unrestricted climb.
Also, it appears no one has yet mentioned the new F-15EX Lot 2 aircraft. Here it is:
Here’s a footage of the EX9’s first flight:
2 Likes
What is different from lot 1?
Nothing new, just how the budgeting for aircraft works out and where money comes from.
1 Like
Yep, like what warthogboy09 said. Also, I found this excerpt from an unpaywalled article that mentions possible differences. Just a heads up - it’s from journalism, so take it with a grain of salt since they might be wrong about some details.
1 Like
I believe the F-15EX Lot 2 aircraft is upgraded to withstand the cyberattacks better. Earlier, a single F-15EX Lot 1B was subjected to cybersurvivability testing where they collected data to assess the performance of the F-15EX under cyberattack. Then, the Lot 2 aircraft would be upgraded to strengthen its cybersecurity. It will be subjected to another cybersurvivability evaluation scheduled this year.
This is a piece of official information I found in the DOT&E FY2024 Annual Report. Start on page 320.
https://www.dote.osd.mil/Annual-Reports/2024-Annual-Report/
Information about the F-15 Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (EPAWSS) can be found on page 316.
1 Like
I recently learned that in real life there is already an AIM-9X Block II+ and now the AIM-9X Block III is entering service. In our game we still don’t even have the first AIM-9X, which was developed in the 90s.
What difference does it make what series it is. If we introduce Hornet C with the old AIM-9M and AIM-120B, which have already been removed from service. Even if Gaijin introduces F-22 tomorrow, it will have AIM-9M and AIM-120A.
I think the f22 could only carry the 120c as It has clipped wings.