That’s why i mentioned later batches of it as it COULD (doesn’t mean it will) equip the more powerful 132’s. You’re right. Right now the F-15EX is equipped with the F110-GE-129 that has around the same amount of thrust as the PW-229
1 Like
I’m all for it, but you understand that Gaijin won’t introduce anything newer than the 80s-90s for the US. Otherwise, it could ruin the comfortable game for Russia.
1 Like
Oh they will (When the Su-57 comes making it mostly useless at the Br because it will fight 5th gen aircraft)
1 Like
“RuSsIaN bIaS”
stop repeating the lies that only exsist simply because there are more US mains. I honestly think that we are all stuck in our own echo chamber. Anybody who has played russia(or russian vehicles in other TTs) know that russian bias is simply due to the fact that you have never played russian vehicles(IS-2 ain’t OP when you play it). Truth is, the reason people belive in russian bias is simply because other than US/german mains, the rest of players are likely russian mains which means you are simply more likely to die to russian tank.
1 Like
Why is the Challenger series’ armour so weak then? why is Britain always given equavilent vehicles way after the others get them? Why does France not even have a top tier MBT yet? You are the typical Russian player that says there is no bias and just blames the useless US and German mains for being skill issues and saying it’s Russian bias.
What is the win rate of the USA and Russia in the top tier?
U.S has low win rates mostly because of gaijin. Giving the U.S a premiun every updated is not alright.
Russian bias is over used tho.
The Abrams can use some buffs not nerfs tho.
Anyways. This is an F-15EX thread
1 Like
I’m a Chinese main
Spot on
See China and Japan. No F-2, J-10C etc
3 Likes
At least China has the Temufighter I left Japan out because it isn’t going to get anything and Gaijin has at least been somewhat kind to give it the best 1st Gen F16 in-game that didn’t even exsit and to gave them one of the best SPAAMS in the game
Ah yes, the stupid slandering of the several unique chinese vehicles that exsist that look nothing like other vehicles.
As for the J-10A, you cannot compare it to the eurofighter. Eurofighter is equivalent to J-10B, and I honestly think (and this is gonna be controversial) that the eurofighter being after the J-10A is understandable, considering China has not been given anything unique for a very long time.
Mitsubishi F-2. As much as I like dunking on japan, japan deserves the F-2.
I honestly think the best way to know there is no bias is to play a bit of each tech tree at times. I do main China however I also play US, Germany, Russia, UK and the other TTs(obviously, i have not gotten very far, but I have played them quite a lot). Then you know the snail makes it so all TTs get equal suffering.
Every group of mains WILL inherently be biased to victimize themselves. I hear tonnes of other Chinese mains claim US and Russian Bias, i hear russian mains claim US bias, and US and german mains claim russian bias.
I understand where you are coming from, I also used to claim russian and german bias, but after playing russia and germany occasionally for a while I understand that Bias does not exsist.
1 Like
I call the J10 series the Temufighter
100% agree on that. It can come now but my point is that dening Russian bias is a dumb argument and can be proven wrong pretty easily. That is without mentioning the bad legal things that Gaijin have done
There is a bit of bias for Germany but most of it is dealing with coping German mains
It definitly does. Britain for example has so many vehicles that can be added but instead there are C&P vehicles and subtrees that don’t need to be there but in-game are needed to do many lacking things
1 Like
You aren’t convincing me any further using this, just makes me think you are some 12 year old
Have you played Russia? If you have not played russia or russian tanks in other TTs you have NO right to complain about russian bias. I used to also be a beliver in russian bias due to the IS-2, but when I unlocked the IS-2 i realized it is not some biased vehicle, just simply one with good stats(e.g. the Spitfire)
If you are only going to use britain as an argument, you ain’t going anywhere; Every main will victimize themselves. Just check out Japanese, Russian, American, Chinese or any other main. Reason why “Russian bias” is discussed so much is simply because there are much more US and German mains
There are so many vehicles that can be added for all tech trees
If you are going to use vehicles as an argument, just see China. We have the unfortunate title of “C&P” because we had little unique vehicles in game, which in fact there are many chinese vehicles that can be added.
3 Likes
Can you guys please take this off-topic conversation to DMs? None of this is relevant to the F-15EX suggestion.
7 Likes
I noticed a mistake in the suggestion. The powerplant would be the F110-GE-129 or the first batches with the F100-PW-229.
The F110-GE-129 would be far more accurate tho
2 Likes
I agree, and I corrected it to the F110-GE-129 now. I shall start to overhaul my history and specs sections later by this evening.
1 Like
I’ve completely retouched the F-15EX Eagle II suggestion post. I got rid of old and junk articles and replaced them with current, reliable materials. I’ve organized them neatly in the sources section.
The suggestion is now updated with improvements and accurate information as of now. If I have missed anything or forgotten to add something, then feel free to ping me here on this thread.
4 Likes
Here’s a YouTube video of F-15 EX Eagle II performing an unrestricted climb.
Also, it appears no one has yet mentioned the new F-15EX Lot 2 aircraft. Here it is:
Here’s a footage of the EX9’s first flight:
2 Likes
What is different from lot 1?
Nothing new, just how the budgeting for aircraft works out and where money comes from.
1 Like