Boeing EA-18G Growler - The Aussie Growler

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

(RAAF) Boeing EA-18G Growler

   Hello everybody. Today, I’d like to introduce and suggest the Aussie EA-18G Growler, an electronic attack variant of the F/A-18F Super Hornet, in War Thunder. EA-18G is initially designed to replace the Northrop Grumman EA-6B Prowler in service with the US Navy and is equipped with highly advanced avionics tailored specifically for electronic warfare operations. Australia has also purchased several EA-18Gs to serve in the Royal Australian Air Force as its very own Airborne Electronic Attack aircraft.

   Please note: The implementation of the EA-18G in game would be most feasible if in-game mechanics such as Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) and jamming capabilities are already implemented, as these features are integral to the Growler’s functionality.

Key Characteristics

  • Airborne Electronic Attack variant of the F/A-18F Super Hornet, retaining most of the critical features
  • 20-mm cannon deleted for the electronic warfare equipment
  • Access to only AIM-120s, AIM-9Xs, and AGM-88s or AGM-154 JSOWs
  • AN/ALQ-218(V)2 receiver pods and ALQ-99 jamming pods as a central electronic warfare system.
  • Capable of performing SEAD operations.

Conclusion | EA-18G’s place in game

   The EA-18G Growler’s role as an electronic warfare aircraft brings a highly tactical and dynamic element to gameplay in War Thunder. It is not only well-suited for the Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) and strike missions against ground-based threats but also capable of escort jamming and disrupting enemy radar systems while defending itself with AIM-120 missiles. However, the implementation of the EA-18G should definitely wait until it is introduced alongside more modern and powerful anti-air and air-defense platforms. This would preferably create a balanced environment where SEAD and strike emissions become essential to counter these advanced defenses, something that will supplement a new gameplay experience.

Related Suggestion - American EA-18G

https://forum.warthunder.com/t/boeing-ea-18g-growler-the-electronic-stinger/204761

Sources

Manufacturers and Official Reports:

Books & Journal Articles:

Wiki Topics:

Thank you for taking the time to read my suggestion! 😃

2 Likes

EA-6 would be cool too

+1 Would be great to see if/when we get ECM and could be a good option for the UK TT.

2 Likes

1 Like

If the anti-air situation in War Thunder isn’t just bad as it’s at the moment, I can’t wait for this banger.

1 Like

i dont want to +1 until i hear your idea of how electronic warfare would be implemented in this game. however if you have a nice idea then ill support

As the game is, electronic warfare would:

  1. Make top tier gameplay even more chaotic and BS than it already is.
  2. Effective usage would require an insane amount of teamwork from a team that can barely take off without crashing.
    And adding the AIM-9X would be insanely broken.
1 Like

+1

Primarily for ANZAC(or CAN-ANZAC) tree.

As I mentioned in the comments of my American EA-18G suggestion, the implementation of electronic warfare (EW) in War Thunder shouldn’t be overly technical due to the classified nature of its details. Instead, it should be simplified while still maintaining its core functionality.

Here’s an example, activating jamming pods could interfere with and prevent certain aircraft or SAM systems from locking onto you within the jammer’s beam zone and up to a fixed distance. However, this doesn’t mean that jamming pods offer complete protection against multiple radar locks at once—they have limitations.

Jamming pods become ineffective when facing multiple enemy aircraft or SAMs, especially if surrounded. Another limitation is their reliance on a single frequency band. To put it simply, the AN/ALQ-99 can only process and jam radio waves within a specific frequency range and can operate on only one band at a time.

This is why the EA-18G carries multiple jamming pods, each covering different frequency bands. Typically, it has two pods on its wings operating at high band and one on the centerline operating at low band, allowing it to jam a wider range of radar frequencies. In some cases, the EA-18G can carry up to five jamming pods, but doing so sacrifices its air-to-air capability. Most military aircraft radars operate in the S-band or X-band, both considered high band, while low band is often used for communication radios, radio navigation signals, and other basic electronics.

In-game, this would mean that players must equip the appropriate pods capable of jamming the specific frequencies used by enemy radars. If the pods don’t match the enemy’s radar frequency, they will be ineffective.

Additionally, I believe jamming pods should be able to disrupt enemy systems, temporarily removing all markers on their screens in AB and RB. The markers would only reappear when the aircraft leaves the jammer’s beam zone or enters close proximity. In SB, jamming could obscure the moving map display and interfere with elements on the instrument panel.

Sorry for the long post, but these are my thoughts on how EW could be implemented while keeping it simple yet effective. This is also why I believe EW should be suggested separately, as it requires substantial guesswork based on known but incomplete information since specific performance details remain classified. I’m sure others may have better ideas or proposals to refine this concept.

Even if full EW implementation isn’t possible, at the very least, the EA-18G should be capable of performing SEAD and firing AGM-88 HARMs.

+1 for aussie jets to GB tech tree, would fill the role of dedicated ECM platform that britain will lack in the future

Don’t know how I missed this suggestion, but yes, +1 for an Australian tree.
I believe until recently the AIM-9X capability was unique to the RAAF, USAF Growlers didn’t have them. But I think I read somewhere recently they’re bringing them on.

1 Like

AIM-9X capability has been there for years and years now, Growler is just a EW super hornet, it can bring the same AAM’s. And the USAF doesnt even use Growlers.

“Growler” means something completely different in 'strine, Kiwi and Pom!

I have read multiple times that it was originally a RAAF-only modification. This 2015 article mentions it as well, direct quotes from our Chief of Airforce (or rather the outgoing Chief at that time). Not like the US couldn’t do it, just that they weren’t doing it at that time.
https://australianaviation.com.au/2015/07/first-raaf-growler-rolls-out/

One of the things you see on our aeroplane is an ATFLIR and an AIM-9X. That was one of the lessons that the Navy learnt [from Libya],” Brown told journalists after the ceremony. “We’re the only ones that have got that capability and I suspect the US Navy will follow very quickly.”
Modifying the Growler to carry the ATFLIR and AIM-9X requires a relatively minor change to the aircraft’s software, as the Super Hornet, upon which the Growler is based, is already cleared to carry both the missile and the pod.

4 Likes