Bmpt and the Bmpt-72

oh-my

image
Any day now gaijin any day now

or this

worthless if it dont get a new atgm.

Or just remodel and fix all the bugs from the tow 2B and A

And they should model the DU in M919

I mean M2A4 with improved engine and APS would go hard. Add ability to mount BUSK too and we’re eating good

The air burst?

Spoiler

2 Likes

I hope the second autocannon will be working soon.

3 Likes

I don’t know if that’s possible in real life; however, I am glad the regular tree one got extra ERA, isolated fuel tanks and spall liners. I was starting to get worried about the Premium one turning out better than the tree one hahah

dont forget the addon 65mm rha slab on the LFP that the tech tree one gets too

1 Like

WOW, I hadn’t noticed that, that’s quite neat actually, thanks for pointing it out!

I mean firing alternately, but it seems that they don’t have a good solution yet.

how did you get the 2nd gun to fire? im going through all key binds and cant get it to work

because they havent figured out a way to make it fire

or

itll stay a glorified bmp 2 on release

2 Likes

Why even add the second 30mm if you cant use it? I dont get it.

In game or irl?

1 Like

roughly how the BMPT loading screen will look like:

5 Likes

In game i mean, i dont know much about this gun system irl.

Or is just russian design at its finest, the comission was to put 2 guns in there, but no one demanded them both to work?

In game i would hope that tank that costs 70 euros, would able to use both guns.

It is a potent anti infantry / armoured support platform in reality, which does not have an immediate counterpart in the west. The guns are for different ammunition types, as for some reason with this design they did not carry across the dual feed of the BMP2. Could be for redundancy, could be for heat dissipation, could also just be “why not, it’ll still do the job”.

2 Likes

IIRC two guns were a requirement to act as a makeshift AA against helies and low alt aircraft in general. The prototype had a single gun and was rejected, there was also Object 787. Not exactly “it”, but fits the bill

1 Like