Im not the one whos crying about nato tanks or jets. Thats the difference
Youre acting like people cant be biased(which you have said it yourself you are, which kinda defeats the point of having any argue for this matter) when it comes to comparing and making their arguments, thats why i prefer skill to be involved in the discussion as someones who apply in practice is better off speaking about it. On paper and ingame can be very different.
Im doing the oppposite actually. I know that i am biased which is why i took the most objective way possible and just took a look at which BR that protection comes up for the first time, you dont need to be good at the game to do a simple comparison. And since you havent even tried to argue against that line of reasoning id guess you actually cant and thats why youre grasping at straws
Like i said, thats just useless. Its pickpocketing in comparison to make your argument more valid but in reality of balancing would not actually a viable way to consider what BR it should sit at.
Im not grasping anything when people are biased but also struggle in the best of the best just come at ru because thats the best way to go and get relieved for their skill troubles
So comparing objective vehicle capabilities is not a viable way to determine its BR now. Very interesting reasoning there. I guess we can move down the Turm III in BR then since its evidently performing terribly?
Pickpocket issues and continue to call other trolls whilst spending more time on forums than on the games, and equally ive seen some of these specific dudes just get laughed at by major discords because of their horrendous takes. We have a bot often or not shows community managers shut them down more often than not