I think the best example was probably the Gripen.
They artificially nerfed BOL for every single aircraft just because it was doing to well, and now a dozen aircraft are suffering because of said BOL nerfs
Yeah numbers dont lie but thats exactly why people with 2 functioning braincells use objective arguments instead of running to statshark and going for the kindergarten argument like you do.
The BMPT has objectively top tier protection against top tier rounds at 10.3
1 Like
Lmao? Russians tanks had autoloader modeled way before the turret basket was modeled in nato tanks. and is quite reasonable
Rafale single handedly dominated and had a fake flight model, where to the point bug reporter mods didnt even carefully watch the hud video, indicating it was overperforming
And for ground the best example for me has to be the EBR 51. Thing got raised from 2.3 to 5.3 with not a single buff for no reason other than the usual stat bs
2 Likes
No. They were added together. Before that ot was just piles of ammo with nothing around it
1 Like
It did got nerfed right? I just killed one by hitting the ammobelt. Or it’s just bugged again?
“Objectively” doesnt matter if you cant apply those braincells when you have the best of the best at ur disposal, anyone can write words, but if you cant apply that ingame its pointless of your argument. thats why your stats dont line up with how u guys communicate on the threads as if you know it all.
Ammo detonation is random. There’s an entire thread proving it. Sometimes it works, sometimes not
2 Likes
they were not, theres already a CM post to the reason why turret basket was added to nato tanks. and simply autoloaders were modeled for Russian tanks before hand
He’s also missing that the t series tanks auto loaders eat strange amounts of spall, while the turret baskets (aside from being ridiculous in their implementation) seem to generate significant amounts of spall.
Oh well… I was happy too soon.
got the link ?
But even if they were added separatly, one’s a buff, the other one’s a nerf. Guess who got what
Yeah i already stated it. The autloader is a buff adding armour to the shells while the basket means you’re dead the moment you take a shot
Ill look for it the cm addressing this. But give me sometime.
I already know that, lol
I can’t believe this can be argument
1 Like
Thats literally what objective means. The argument is objective if its independent of the personal skill of the person making it. The first russian vehicle to get Relict access sits at 12.3 and even then that one only gets it on the sideskirts and not all over. Add in the unmanned turret and the hilarious ammo belt and you get a vehicle that has no business meeting Leopard 1s
3 Likes
Defending rafailure is funny, even direct support himself has said we needed a damn change, i mean like we had rafale dominance for a year.
well that’s my only point, when something other than russia performs well, it gets nerfed in br but also in performance. You never or very rarely see that to russian vehicles
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
So are we completely ignoring the weakspots of the goated Russian lower font plate and center hull underneath the turret? Nice to knock it out quickly?