17? I only carry 9 , one in the breech.
1 Like
I only carry 15, in all T series,14 one in the breech
3 Likes
I carry full ammo every game, 29/30 APFSDS and 5 HE/HEVT lol
5 Likes
True men.
T serie player be like:
4 Likes
Conveniently, bmp-t´s doesn´t have turret baskets.
4 Likes
This thing is pretty broken. I’ve been having a heyday with it just melting vehicles apart, especially when I squad with other BMPT’s. Literally just overwhelm the enemy team with them and tank all there rounds since Relikt just absorbs it. It needs to be BR 11.0 and this will only be further proven once both guns can be fired together.
1 Like
honestly, i dont think russia needs anymore tanks,planes or anything at this point, they are already a big enough pain in the ass in game.
1 Like
I’m running some testing for the damage model now
Abrams/M735
The spots I aimed at consistently result OHKO
The side ERA will absorb one APFSDS and it’s consistent enough that 7 out of 10 will deal no critical damage, some will kill one crew but this is only M735
11 Likes
You’ve hit the nail on the head regarding Soviet ERA armor. I’ve never had as many problems with any tank as I have with Soviet ERA armor.
1 Like
You fail to grasp a simple truth. For the Terminator to remain at 10.3, it shouldn’t have any armor at all. Its armor should only be effective against machine guns and autocannons up to 50mm.
5 Likes
And could you explain why? Instead of spouting dogmatic statements without any argumentation.
Well, because no other vehicle in this BR has such armor and mobility at the same time. Moreover, even without armor, the Terminator outperforms many non-Soviet IFVs and light tanks in this BR.
2 Likes
I don’t care where it goes though, and US mains are just jealous that their country can’t build anything remotely looking as cool as the Terminator lol
6 Likes
For example, the US has the M2A4E1 or M2A4E2 Bradley with BRAT reactive armor, LWS, and the new Ironfirst active protection system. If the US had such an IFV in its line, it would be a competitor to the Terminator.
A Bradley with Iron Fist and BRAT can fight against a BMPT without being “meat.”
1 Like
Modernized bradley still using the same tow?
In reality, the BMPT Terminator is completely pointless. Because of its tank chassis, it has a limited fuel range and limited cruising life due to the tank engine. Therefore, it cannot reach the battlefield under its own power. It cannot lead infantry and cannot engage tanks. Essentially, this is a red flag for the US and other countries.
2 Likes
TOW-2B Aero.
TOW-2B RF (Radio Frequency)
1 Like
They have a lot of unique-looking vehicles and I’m a big fan of their obscure heavy tanks like IS-7 and Object 279, even Hideo Kojima the creator of Metal Gear series was really versed in obscure Soviet vehicles. They also feature the strange prototype plane that hovers above lakes, Beriev vva14.
I play soviet tanks for the drip, not for politics. At least I admit I’m here for the aesthetics, not the freedom bonuses lol btw are you a Pentagon employee?
4 Likes
So how tf do you think tanks reach the battlefield? And if tanks can do it, why do you think a lighter IFV with the same engine and gearbox can’t do the same thing?
5 Likes
Because a regular IFV has a different engine, a different gearbox, and a longer range due to its low weight.
1 Like