How ? F-18C early with German one was added in same patch Su-33 and JA37 added patch before only difference is F-2A ADTW and CF-188A
the 13.3 Su-30 premiums weren’t there and the overall matchmaker was very prone to downtiers for 12.3 (the German hornets were also added later)
Which means that F-18A would be prone for getting uptier year ago before premium Su-30 was added.
Uptiers feel very common at 12-13 recently with the addition of other planes and gaijin shaking up the BR tree a little.
no, it had downtiers way more commonly, I would know as that’s when I played it
Most of these vehicles were either not op or straight up unfair to count as op.
In its entire history, the 2S38 was decompressed only once, and that was at 0.3 BR. The Bradley, which simply became unplayable and is the worst IFV, is decompressed by a full 1 BR.
Is this a joke? Is the SEP-V2 better than the T-90M?
The same thing happened when the Su-30SM came out, everyone even forgot about the F-15E. The Su-30SM was OP in terms of CAS and A2A armament. The F-15E didn’t get a new radar, it didn’t get an increased number of missiles, it just got a slightly better engine.
Ahahahahahahaha.
Yes it is, most people with the ability to actually aim agree that the SEPv2 is miles better than the T-90M, especially after the multiple buffs.
The only reason you disagree because you, infact, can’t aim for shit.
Yeah this one is on me, I meant to type F-15E > Su-34 as these released in the same update. I don’t know why my brain changed it to Su-30SM. I probably typed that name too much in the recent past lol.
Ah yes such a weak tank (and most of these stats are from 10.7-11.7 games tanks to my cursed matchmaker):
Just because you will likely do bad in it doesn’t mean it isn’t better than most of the russian 10.7 tanks lol. Only Russian tanks around that BR that I would pick over the M10 is the BMPT and maybe the 292.
1 Like
f15E got cas weapons close to the flankers.
maybe your point was the fire forget missile.
Buffs? Oh yeah, I remember the Abrams buff when they didn’t give it DU armor, or when all Abrams got a turret basket. Are these the improvements you’re introducing?
The SEP v2 is terrible. It has no armor, no spall liner. It’s slow.
The Su-34 received the non-existent Kh-38MT, which simply destroyed the entire ballistic missile system.
It’s a terrible tank, it’s huge, it’s slow, it has no armor at all. It’s the worst version of the Stryker. I don’t know why they added it.
This Battle Rating already has the first Abrams, yes, it has a weaker shell, but it has speed, a low silhouette and some armor.
1 Like
In terms of missiles, the F-15E did not receive anything new at all.
2S38 came into the game when autocannons were matured: Strf 9040C, Begleitpanzer, HSTVL, and VCC-80/60 all offered good reference material for 2S38’s BR.
It was too low on introduction, but was quickly moved.
M3A3 was among the first APFSDS IFVs added to the game, with little reference material to gauge the ideal BR for it.
It turns out APFSDS IFVs are best placed 10.0 onward today.
And now we’re at BMPT, the most armored autocannon-missile carrier sporting T-72B’s composite array with a turret that’s pointless to shoot at due to the ammo storage being allegedly incorrect. I’m alleging that it’s incorrect alongside others.
It’s the EBR/PT-76-57/Puma situation again, but I can’t tell if it’s as bad as those or if my emotions are clouding judgement.
M10 Booker is significantly better than M1128 as well.
When I see people dead serious discussing Russian bias by the end of 2025…
1 Like
It received more buffs than nerfs over the last 2 years.
- maybe take off tusk II, that will make it about the same mobility as the other top tier Abrams tanks.
- You are just garbage at the game, maybe it’s time to accept that, especially if you think that the T-90M is better than the SEPv2.
Refer to point 2 of the above.
M10 has much more potential in battle than the M1128.
1 Like
thats not even the issue your ignoring it probably due to cope. but the terminator should be 12,7 due to the fact it survives side shots and shooting lower front plate doesnt blow it up like it does every other russian tank
1 Like
I have killed them with almost every side shot I took at a BMPT unless it was poorly aimed by me.
The problem with the BMPT is it’s frontal protection + firepower at it’s BR. For side shots similar places as the normal T-series have always done the job for me.
Also me calling out Demokrat’s skill issues is not fully related to my opinion about the BMPT. Sure they have some overlap, but they are generally seperate things.
Object 906 survived a side shot from Leopard 1. I guess it needs to be 12.7 now. /s
Surviving bad shots is not a reason to increase BRs of vehicles. [This is not a comment related to BMPT.]
BMPT deserves to go up for rather valid reasons.
the t90m has more amour then the sepv2, also the t90 doesnt blow up when you shoot the carousel when it should as its an automatic kill if you hit the carousel, the sepv2 has a broken turret basket which was the nerf to nato tanks since gaijin needed to have more russian bias so if you get hit in the terribly modeled turret basket you lose horizontal drive when on the t90 you get hit in the carousel and you still have horizontal drive. your seriously delusional if you think the sepv2 is even on par with the t90m russian bias machine
1 Like
I mean maybe its not russian bias but it’s very clear and evident that gaijin released the BMPT intentionally to be overpowered and to incentivize you to buy the premium (aka, p2w).
2 Likes