I’m being honest.
And you’re not wrong.
If the vehicles were on any other nation, they would be 10.7 at the absolute minimum.
The thing is at the same br as the Ajax which is just utterly absurd.
Does it make gaijin money? Absolutely. Is it a complete joke the way it’s implemented and the br it’s at? Also absolutely.
1 Like
Read the comment I was responding to Dr. Watson.
Depends on which Russian vehicles:
Russian MBTs? No. The Abrams skill ceiling is just that much higher than that of the T-series. Basically the only thing that limits the M1’s skill ceiling is the players max skill level, while often the T-series limit the full potential of the player’s skill when it comes to good players.
Russian IFVs? I’m not qualified enough to confidently talk about those imo, because most of my experience comes from facing them.
2 Likes
Of course nobody believes how bad US players are (every of nuke speedruns are made on US server).
Imagine lost a fight to a vehicle that can be 1 shotted with 20mm cannon 🤣
BMPT is slow , unarmored(50mm front plate, 20mm turret front) trash with 3kmh reverse speed
That’s some heavy cherry picking you’re doing there. You’re completely ignoring angles, armour composition and era.
It’s not slow, and yeah the reverse speed is terrible but that’s just the standard Russian design flaw.
1 Like
By IFV standard it is , the mobility is extremely limited. You keep yapping about the armour while ignoring every single down side of the vehicle. If you can’t even talk about it from many perspective why bother at all ?
For a person whom only play one nation that keep talking about other nation like they play multiple is insane.
1 Like
I haven’t mentioned the armour except in my reply, so you might want to actually check stuff before going off on one.
I play multiple nations, which you should also really check before jumping down my throat.
My issue with the thing is the absurd accuracy gaijin gave the guns which flies in the face of reality. The way it shakes like an alcoholic in the morning is kinda a defining “feature” of the vehicle and should be represented in game.
guys, I need a tip how to kill it
1 Like
At least if it is 10.7 it can get sucked into 11.7 black hole
Yeah, 10.7 would be much better. Facing it in an amx-30 105 ain’t much fun.
LMAO wtf.
Lol era so effective that it makes the apfsds get returned to sender
You can’t be serious.
You really be talking about “absurd accuracy gaijin gave the guns which flies in the face of reality”. I will have to remind you that while Gaijin themself advertise the game as super realistic or whatever they wrote on the front page to get the average player to actually bother to play this game.
Before the BMPT there are already stuff that clearly a historical. For a game it need to be that , if you want people to hear you , then you gotta talk from all aspect. Not super yap about one point or two.
A lot of people would agree with you if you actually be able to present all your point. Not one or two point and recycle them like Gaijin did with their premium pack.
1 Like
It gave you that UNO reverse card there lol
jokes aside just shoot the hull
1 Like
You clearly haven’t played the Ajax if you think it’s better than the BMPT. It’s massive and has no armour. The moment a BMPT sees you, you are dead. Meanwhile, you have to react in a split second to shoot that tiny, thin weakspot on the BMPT front, maybe doing superficial damage and you’re still dead. Side on? You can’t even damage the BMPT side-on in the Ajax. What are you talking about?!
1 Like
I disagree
50mm front plate. Just like space between hull and turret of Abrams, but bigger and slower.
I agree that BMPT should be at 11.0, but only because right now it can face 9.3 💀
?
Not sure what posting (what I assume are) my stats has anything to do with the conversation TBH, it just makes you look a bit of an idiot and out of arguments but you do you I guess.
Im guessing that the point you were trying to make was that other stuff is inaccurate so that makes it ok? It’s kinda hard to figure out what point you’re trying to make as you’re all over the place and not very coherent.
If that is your point, other guns have their accuracy modelled. The 17pdr apds for example. Other stuff being wrong doesn’t excuse the bmpt - two wrongs don’t make a right after all.
It’s like taking a Churchill tank, removing the armour and making it fast. That’s ok as other stuff is wrong too seems to be the argument you’re making
BMPT is even more massive than Ajax tho and rushing the enemies in the BMPT like you described is prob the most effective tactics it got to play somewhat good. Otherwise it gets one tap by basically anyone that knows where to shoot it on the turret.
1 Like