BMPT at 11.3 would do something but I think Gajin can do better and fix it at 10.7.
It’s a good tank with potential to be balanced I rather not see it die because of BR increase which I think it will since 12.7 it’s extremely useless.
1 Like
And yet it made you still comment on it :P
there is no way to balance the tank at 10.7 and even at 11.3 it would be blatantly op still
Ik this because i’m playing 11.3 israel and keep getting down tiers and my tanks cant even kill the thing.
It needs to be against things that have a way to pen its armour consistently or have a way to overpressure it. the only tanks that i can thinkg of that can do that are above 12.0 or are Russian
You really do love taking things out of context to original statements.
3 Likes
Also to answer your question’s I don’t believe you hate Russian equipment.
I also do believe USA has OP tanks for sure but M1A1 HC variants is definitely not one of them, but I think it’s perfect at its current BR.
Lastly, regardless of an advertisement department or development department. A company as a whole should always be aware of their community I work in program management and can say regardless of where the company moves as one. So one ignorant mistake on an ad is at fault of the whole company not just advertisement.
3 Likes
BMPT can be balanced at 10.7 or even 10.3 with “selective realism”. The game should prioritize balance of the tank being “realistic .” However from its current design, moving up to even 12.7 could kill the tank.
1 Like
@Got_a_choppa
I took nothing out of context. Your post contains a false accusation in order to upset someone. That’s the only context my post alluded to.
All of my posts on this topic are in related to wanting BMPT moved up, that’s the only other context.
If I were to bait I’d just claim Russian bias exists and dismiss OP vehicles of other tech trees.
@Lambda_Delta
If USSR had a 12.0 tank with DM53, a 5.3 second reload, decent armor, and great mobility you’d correctly call it OP.
Nope, I do not believe Russian tanks are OP. Top tier all you need is LRF and knowing where to shoot. My only complaint at top tier is helicopter fire and forget missiles from behind a mountain top being a broken playstyle.
4 Likes
You know what… I’ll take that perspective. It’s consistent, well thought out, and reasonable.
I disagree with it still, but I understand you.
1 Like
@AlvisWisla I tend to think a lot of the community would agree. If this is your idea of pushing false narrative to upset someone then I don’t know what your smoking bro 😂
1 Like
@Got_a_choppa People are entitled to their beliefs.
I just told you my plan if I were to ever bait though; I’d just go all-in on the Russian bias claims if I ever did.
I won’t, cause I prefer laziness, honesty, and being as good as I can to others.
I posted no narratives in my replies to you either.
You should listen to @SilentTracker , cause most of his views are a good representation of mine.
What would you classify it then if you would buff its SP cost and remove its ammo box? (As thats what differs between the class of light-heavy and TD)
You just got there?Imo they could simply just say the buff random russian stuff to “balance” the game out,even tho they make those BR unplayable
It would honestly make some people stop hating on them
6 Likes
New class. HEAVY FIGHTING ARMORED VEHICLE.
Honestly, a IFV class could be handy to add, instead of marking the PUMA and Bradley as a light tank, we could mark it as a IFV
Ifv ? What would be the difference lol
More crew ?
Instead of marking the Bradley as a light tank, it would be a IFV, whereas the booker would still be a light tank.
they should remove its apds
Prob maybe SP or maybe make IFVs more able to scout around with drones making like idk…IFVs have faster recharge of drones and stuff
The ideas CAN be made,you simply have to find a balancer between light tanks and IFVs
That wouldn’t be a nerf… APHE drops barrels faster.