Well the way I see it, issue with this is two fold:
kinda interested in your experience with it. so chop chop, get to spading.
i mean lmao, they literally invented the category, the bmpt is the only vehicle in that category, also its only deployment in real combat had it destroyed and it saw little to no combat besides that.
Destroyed combat or strike ? I think these are 2 important aspect that can define vehicles power
ehhhh, you expect people to play aggressively when they need to aim for weakspots?, i flank occasionally but in maps where that isnt possible beign aggressive against t series is much harder, leopards also are annoying but theyre easier to kill for me.
Russia deployed a couple, they got obliterated. Not a lot produced and in an age with drones producing tanks and expensive equipment is changing.
idk obliterated, but 1 got destroyed and the rest got damaged, since then no more were deployed
Go play In a leopard 2A4 a few days and then comeback and say it was good and all of us can’t aim properly
yeah i wanted to grind my britain 10.7 lineup during the event but i dont think ill even touch the boxer crt when i get it
I would post of video but I don’t want to get banned for showing dying Russians running out on fire. One thing for sure, Russia equipment does not care about crew survival.
I haven’t gotten the crv yet but if it’s aps is as bad as the kf41 I won’t even touch it. And ik it’ll be bad because god forbid a NATO tank countering a Russian tank. Shit is not even funny I had to switch to arcade and only play spaa that’s how I grinded through 10.7-11.3
in the test drive it straight up doesnt work on side aspect shots.
As expected but I’m grinding namer tsrikhon and the aps works on that thing thankfully
Is it actually good? Was grinding Israel but I’m heavily merka out after playing too many Magbachs.
my brother likes it, but i imagine its as good as a vehicle with spikes and bushmaster can be.
The terminator has raised the bar for IFV and tank destroyers. Pumas, bradleys, CRVs, Lynx, every IFV needs to be reconsidered now. BR wise, external belts, ATGMS, armor, everything.
Each rank has a vehicle you can enjoy rank 4 m51 , zachlam tager , hovet
rank 5 , shilka , magach 5 , sho’t
rank 6 , magach hydra, shot Kal alef , machbet , merkava mk1b
rank 7 namer 30, both merkava’s , Sabra mk1
rank 8 (I only have Spyder which is pretty good giving that I haven’t tried other nations top tier spaa )
Also the namer 30 is actually very good 20 degrees of depression it doesn’t have that much ammo but since it has a crewless turret you can just bait multiple enemies and waist their time and ammo so I’m looking forward to namer tsrikhon
It’s ass compared to others but I like it
Bradleys carries 9 people total
German Puma carries 9 people total
BMPT is a BMP without the Infantry so it’s actually a tank destroyer fights with infantry as an IFV but the main goals of the rest was APC.
Gajin says nah, light tank and Tank Destroyer. Completely different mission set vehicles but are supposed to act like tanks?
My opinion is those should not be in game. Else I want a toyota with ATGM already.
They are not in the same category at all even mission wise.
I really wished Gaijin left ground as just pure MBT fighting MBT. That’s why WWII is still loved by veteran players. IFVs and autocannon SPAA makes matches a clusterfuck as MBTs.
