Is there any proof that leopard 2 hull liners work worse than other hull liners?
Never seen anyone say smth like that, even the enemy team agrees on that.
If you ever see someone saying that, its either a troll or a bmpt player
1 Like
I’m of the opinion that the most annoying nation to fight is the one that knocked out my vehicle last (I play arcade and nothing else)
How when I say that in a 11.7 match in the T80 UK?
Remember that those who think that everything is perfectly balanced in Russia have two sides weighing on their shoulders.
One side is the one that benefits as much as possible from how long a vehicle or missile has been stolen in order to upgrade the nation or unlock other things.
The other side is that even without needing to research anything or obtain anything, they just seek the highest level of pleasure possible by throwing themselves in front of the enemy, knowing that they won’t die so easily and thus completely ruin 3 BR within the game 9.7/10.3/10.7 because, as we all know, Gaijin has a rule that you can fall 1.0 BR above or 1.0 BR below.
If they really wanted to improve the quality of the BRs, they would have to move it to at least 12.0, because then it would fall against 11.0 at a minimum and 13.0 at a maximum. And it would still maintain a decent win rate because we would agree to give it APFSDS in exchange for this BR increase.
1 Like
I’m on my phone rn.
This report is outdated. This problem has already been fixed and the spall liners generally began to work differently.
Proof?
Cus it doesn’t appear to “have been fixed” at all:
Turret vs hull no.1 vs hull no.2
As far as I am concerned, the report is still very much up to date as the behavior of hull liners doesn’t match the correct behavior of turret liners, and this is the case for every Leopard 2 with hull liners, incl 2A7HU, Strv 122 (all).
4 Likes
Who could have guessed pumping out state propaganda and embellishing the capabilities of your paper-tiger vehicles would help you in video games and lead to horrible balancing while the other side have majority restricted or classified so they need to do guesswork. gotta love the Snail
4 Likes
How I love the bear without claws and the paper tiger, always so willing to do anything, but backing down at the last warning.
War Thunder is the only game where the bear actually has strong, sharp claws, and the tiger really looks menacing with its fangs.
To play devils advocate slightly, the M1A2T has a much better stock grind than the other M1A2s.
My stats in the M1A2T are also better than my SEPv2 stats, even though now the SEPv2 is the better tank. However the SEPv2 are also partially legacy stats from when the 2A7s/122s were even more dominant than they are now.
1 Like
im assuming youre talking about yours, not the global december I posted.
Which, perfectly fine, I wouldnt even go check if you didnt bring it up; I wanted to confine this to global stats.
And I mean, sure, stock grind does play a part - but does it play large enough part for such noticable difference to take place?
also were kinda getting offtopic so id suggest to take it to DMs if you want.
1 Like
You’ve never played WoT then ahve you
I would echo that, in the Ajax it is far and I mean far easier to kill any Leopard, M1 and Leclerc from the side than any T-series tank
1 Like
I don’t like tanks with HP bars.
change the title to BMPT/72 should not be 10.7 lol
‘‘BMPT/72 should not be arround 10.3 - 11.7’’ ?
2 Likes