Yeah, m900 should go through its sides like butter… after shots like this i just j-out. Great work Gajin.
1 Like
Add the 9M220O as well
My bad, I guess latter has marginally better mobility that comes with a worse shell. It’s surely the reason why it performs better than the TT 1A5, even in the hands of terrible wallet warriors.
And can also be a magnet that attracts experienced players looking for an easier way to grind out nation in question. I guess those two can cancel each other out, as seen in the stats.
Stats will average out after millions of games played, so it’s pretty much the best thing you can use to gauge vehicle performance, of course after you account for differences in average skill between major and minor nations.
Even if we account for that, I don’t see how 2S38 is overperforming, unless you think overperformance = 1.0 K/D.
I hope you can understand what’s wrong in this picture.
For something so brokenly OP I’d expect them to retain pretty high stats across their lifetime, but they don’t.
And no, there’s nothing indicating that premium (buyable) vehicles are suffering, stat wise, due to wallet warriors shitting up their stats.
2 Likes
there has only been 1 destroyed so far and it wasnt with a fpv drone but with arti…
bmpt has less combat loss than the abram in the current conflict, yet even loe2a4 a seen more succes that the abram.
did you think before you talk ? bmpt has insane fire power and can deal with trench/urban combat more that a mbt, of course its rare to see it as 80% of ukraine is flate and not city.
also if you think that bmpt has less range than the abram, you just are out of this world.
just a quick reminder that T90m has 550km with 2.9 L/km while the abram has 350km with 4.5 L/km
2 Likes
Do you understand common distribution?
1 Like
Multiple have been destroyed and yes so have M1s and Leopards. The comparison is crazy or shouod we compare how many m1s vs T-90/80s and 72s?
I sometimes think you must be Russian and your internet or sources are censored.
2 Likes
Incredible whataboutism. The BMPT does its job well.
3 Likes
Lets be honest here it is Gaijin, they were never really going to give it a fair BR with it being a russian premium that could boost the op 10.3 lineup they already have.
Just because the player of the vehicle is good doesnt mean the vehicle is undertiered. Goes both ways
4 Likes
Good job ignoring everything I’ve said.
sometime i also think your from the us, comparing 3 different tank with 400+ in combat to a 16 abram squad. you are really smart.
I doubt it does in this forum.
The turret and atgms straight up eat shot and dont get damaged at all.
I was noticing that yesterday, these things are basically immune from the front.
Anyone saying they dont need to be fixed/go up in B.R is just abusing them themselves.
1 Like
dont forget how big the puma is in comparison the terminator, making it a much bigger target
Buddy it doesnt, the 30mm rounds lack penetration the guns are inaccurate but yes it can put down large volumes of fire.
One of the motivations for T-15 is lessons in Syria when the BMP-T performed poorly
3 Likes
it’s the usual coping method
“RU tank is OP and under br’d again”
RU supporters "nah your tripping because (insert reason here) "
multiple and many people later - “no we’re not”
RU people = “well skill issue RU poor”
4 Likes
Maybe ill wait with grinding for the Ajax…
They don’t lack penetration though? And its designed for infantry support, not tank on tank combat.
From playing 10.7 US a bit today, it doesn’t help that US players at the moment seem to be pretty much free kills around that BR. So of course an already strong vehicle like the BMPT will stomp even harder.
I have seen lawnchairs that were harder to fold than a lot of the 10.7 US teams
7 Likes
That isn’t whataboutism and isn’t even close.