Bruh …u are clearly not the sharpest pencil in this set…
oO
Bruh, like i said before, the main problem here is not “armor”, but it’s autocanon. And all autocanon in WT ( WT dont have any “reality” elements ) has huge advantage. All tanks with autocanons are too good, or almost useless. The same problem is with BMPT.
another one …
Yeah, i belive ppl here can read, but i expecting too much xD
Get off the forums and go play some more. A KD of only 2 on the terminator is just sad
I loved this game.I think this is the last days of the game if done nothing.
Oh yeah such a big weakspot
U are sad bruh xD
The autocannon is annoying yes but theres better ones even at russian 10.3. Its not the reason why people think the BMPT is broken. That would be the 12.3 tank chassis the unmanned turret without internal ammo belt sits on
I dont need to watch. They dont delete BMPT from game, and everyone know it. BMPT is unbalanced at all.
You are completing missing the point though.
Yes all Autocanon tanks are good. But all can usually be killed with a single shot anywhere.
The only tank in game with both top tier MBT armour AND an autocanon is the BMPT.
BMP, Puma, Ajax, CV90, any of these come round the corner, you can usually fire and kill it, especially in a vehicle of the same class. In the BMPT… in a MBT with a good enough shell you have a fraction of the second to nail a tiny weakspot and pray it works. In an IFV… J out.
That is the problem. To pretend the BMPT is just like any other IFV/AFV is just intentionally being misleading
It’s hangar simulations bruh, go and verify it in game.
yeas and no - 2S38 has slower rate of fire, so give u chance to react.
BMPT problem is, it can’t be balanced in WT. You have 2 choices there - if u set it higher, probably make it useless. If you stay - will be above average. I use BMPT a lot at 13.0 set, and there is typicall troll tank - when i have nothing more to get, i get BMPT ( enemies uses then light tanks etc ). Sometimes u can do something fun with it, but mostly u are free frag for MBT - ofc, if your enemy dont panic when he sees BMPT xD
I could not agree more.BMP2M is annoying to deal with it but it is easy to kill.
So? Like any other 10.3/10.7 AFV used at 10.3/10.7?
You just admitted that it works fine at 13.0 and is balanced similarly to how say the Ajax is balanced at 10.3.
So BMPT to 13.0?
On paper, yes.
PUMA have problem with BMPT only frontally, side are one shoot one BMPT kill :>
True, but BMPT is not a IFV, gaijin classified it as tank destroyer.
and in reality?
It literally has the same hull and ERA config as the T-72B3 and T-90M respectively.
And unlike those, it has an unmanned turret that is very hard to disable… At least with either of those other tanks you can fairly easily destroy barrel or gun breach.
Right and?
Puma and BMPT meet headon. BMPT always wins. Period.
That isnt balance.
Which means it gets an ammo crate, more like a buff than a nerf.
But that is still a poor excuse for it to be sub 11.0
Ppl use PUMA with 2A7, so PUMA to 12.7
Bruh, there is a ppl who use T-34-85 at top. What that mean ? Totally nothing.
That is the worst possible argument I have ever seen to justify a vehicle being massively under BRed.
BMP2M has the same rate of fire but gets APFSDS so its also better not just the 2S38.
What do you mean on paper? Is it a relict plastered MBT chassis or is it not?
It’s WT, not reality. there is nothing comparable to reality.
I dont agree with second one now, it;s not that hard to disable turret. But yeah, there is a “advantage” of BMPT, repair i 12 seconds only.
And never will be.
Are we really comparing puma to BMPT? They legit have different classifications.
Bro …
xD
True but vehicles need to be balanced at their BR against each other no matter the classification